2002
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00689-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
241
2
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
241
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is likely the body of the animal also received at least a certain component of the physical signal despite efforts to primarily target the cranium. As in previous studies [6,14,15,37], systemic perturbations were not evident but cannot be excluded as a factor that influenced the results. Finally, transmissibility Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, it is likely the body of the animal also received at least a certain component of the physical signal despite efforts to primarily target the cranium. As in previous studies [6,14,15,37], systemic perturbations were not evident but cannot be excluded as a factor that influenced the results. Finally, transmissibility Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The anabolic effects of HF loading on bone and bone healing have been reported in several animal [16][17][18]42] and clinical trials [19,20]. It is well established that bone has the potential of sensing and responding to very small mechanical signals when applied at HF [43]. Since the process of osseointegration of oral implants involves the bone healing process, it was assumed that HF loading might positively affect peri-implant bone healing and osseointegration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estrogens are known to regulate the rate and extent of bone remodeling, but the bone homeostasis balance is probably modulated by the prevailing mechanical environment [45]. Also, this phenomenon was observed only in the region where bone formation (modeling) takes place and not at the cortical, remodeling region [43]. The differential effect of HF WBV on the OVX cortical versus trabecular bone could be explained by the presence of decreased cortical bone mass and the correlation of the tissue response to HF loading to the bone mass, as observed by Judex et al [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Emphasizing the mechanical nature of the stimulus, vibrations do not produce systemic skeletal changes, but act in a local, sitespecific manner. 21 Despite successes of WBV in small-scale clinical trials, 22,23 an apparent limitation is its reliance on weight bearing as only bones of the lower and axial skeleton can be targeted by standing on a vibrating plate. Confining the anabolic response to weightbearing bones excludes skeletons incapable of bearing weight (e.g., patients with spinal injuries or muscular dystrophy) or clinically important sites not associated with weight bearing (e.g., distal radius).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%