2009
DOI: 10.1002/polb.21813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Spectral Hole Burning in polymer solutions

Abstract: Mechanical Spectral Hole Burning (MSHB) was previously developed to investigate dynamic heterogeneity for polymeric materials, which exhibit relatively weak dielectric responses. In our previous work, MSHB was applied to a densely entangled block copolymer and successfully distinguishes the heterogeneous from the homogeneous states. Here, a series of polystyrene (PS) solutions was chosen to further investigate the effect of different types of heterogeneity on mechanical spectral hole burning. The three types o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solution samples were prepared in diethyl phthalate (DEP) with a purity of 99.5% obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. To make solution samples, toluene was used as a cosolvent to facilitate mixing, as described by Qin et al 47 After the solvent and solute were fully mixed, the toluene was removed by vacuum evaporation without the significant loss of DEP because of its low vapor pressure. The concentration of the solution was calculated based on the masses of polyDODT and DEP added before the toluene evaporation; the total mass of polyDODT and DEP was measured to confirm that there is no significant loss of DEP after the toluene evaporation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution samples were prepared in diethyl phthalate (DEP) with a purity of 99.5% obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. To make solution samples, toluene was used as a cosolvent to facilitate mixing, as described by Qin et al 47 After the solvent and solute were fully mixed, the toluene was removed by vacuum evaporation without the significant loss of DEP because of its low vapor pressure. The concentration of the solution was calculated based on the masses of polyDODT and DEP added before the toluene evaporation; the total mass of polyDODT and DEP was measured to confirm that there is no significant loss of DEP after the toluene evaporation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B) Vertical holes and (D) horizontal holes. Data courtesy of Qin et al [85] McKenna [81,82] did observe holes in the terminal flow regime. A point of importance in all hole burning experiments is that, as noted above, the magnitude of the holes is very small relative to the overall linear or modified response.…”
Section: Nonresonant Spectral Hole Burningmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This is seen clearly in Figure 16B where one can see the modified response is <10% different from the linear response. Perhaps more importantly, though, is the fact that the holes in Figures 17A,C correspond to dielectric measurements on the glass‐forming liquid propylene carbonate near to the glass transition temperature [ 80,84 ] while those for Figures 17B,D correspond to a mechanical hole burning response of a polystyrene (PS) in diethylphthalate (DEP) solution [ 85 ] far above the glass transition temperature Tg. Since it is frequently invoked that the hole burning response occurs due to heterogeneities that can be effectively attributed to local heating events [ 80,84,86–90 ] (either changing the local fictive temperature or due to a distribution of effective heat capacities that lead to a similar result) it is surprising that the response far above the Tg can still exhibit holes because in this regime small changes in temperature or fictive temperature do not have large effects on the dynamics, unlike near to the glass transition.…”
Section: Dynamic Heterogeneity and Nonlinear Viscoelasticity In Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the two relaxation moduli that are calculated from the opposite directions are averaged and compared with the equilibrium G ( t ). Differences are referred to as “holes.” It is interpreted that holes exist when the LAOS step is carried out at frequencies in both the rubbery plateau and rubbery plateau‐to‐terminal regimes, but not in the terminal regime . In spite of the similarities in combining a step strain with LAOS, we present a fundamentally distinct viewpoint and analysis framework and emphasize the enhanced understanding in both the rheology and microstructure via recovery rheology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%