2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0cc05684g
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical rigidity of a shape-memory metal–organic framework increases by crystal downsizing

Abstract: Soft porous nanocrystals with a pronounced shape-memory effect exhibit a three-fold increase in elastic modulus compared to the microcrystalline counterpart as determined by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. The increase in...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the elastic modulus results for nanocrystals are expected to yield an average response reflective of all planes of the bulk crystal, as previously described. 30,31,[36][37][38] The average elastic modulus and standard deviation values were 0.7 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.8 GPa for base-modified and unmodified ZIF-8 nanocrystals, respectively. Thus, in situ synthesis of ZIF-8 nanocrystals with triethylamine (Et3N) modulator resulted in a marked three-fold decrease in elastic modulus and a corresponding increase in framework flexibility compared to unmodified ZIF-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the elastic modulus results for nanocrystals are expected to yield an average response reflective of all planes of the bulk crystal, as previously described. 30,31,[36][37][38] The average elastic modulus and standard deviation values were 0.7 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.8 GPa for base-modified and unmodified ZIF-8 nanocrystals, respectively. Thus, in situ synthesis of ZIF-8 nanocrystals with triethylamine (Et3N) modulator resulted in a marked three-fold decrease in elastic modulus and a corresponding increase in framework flexibility compared to unmodified ZIF-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…AFM nanoindentation showed force versus indentation depth plots that were purely elastic, enabling us to fit the stress-strain curve to the JKR elastic contact model. 30,31,[36][37][38] For a given indentation depth past 3 nm, the force applied to the solids was about three times more in the unmodified nanocrystals of ZIF-8 compared to the modified samples (Figure 2c). The average elastic moduli of the nanocrystals were statistically similar within each sample type and were combined into two separate histograms (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations