2007
DOI: 10.1121/1.2805042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical response measurements of real and artificial brass players lips

Abstract: Mechanical frequency responses of human and artificial lips in brass instrument playing have been measured using a high-speed digital video technique, in an attempt to classify the true nature of the “lip-reed.” Four semiprofessional human players were used, and three notes played on a trombone were studied. All measurements revealed a strong mechanical resonance with “outward striking” behavior; the played note always sounded above this frequency. Several measurements also showed a weaker second resonance, ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…large slope magnitude as shown in Figure 2. Since the stiffness K increases linear with increasing m,t he estimated Yo ung'smodulus increases linearly with m.The retrievedv alues are within the order of magnitude reported for 'in-vivo'e stimations [10,11], although reported 'invivo'values vary significantly (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).Recall that both the magnitude of the gathered resonance frequencies as well as the number of resonances peaks on the 'in-vitro' measured mechanical resonance frequencies are relevant with respect to 'in-vivo'observations [4].…”
Section: Mechanical Frequency Response and Parameter Estimationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…large slope magnitude as shown in Figure 2. Since the stiffness K increases linear with increasing m,t he estimated Yo ung'smodulus increases linearly with m.The retrievedv alues are within the order of magnitude reported for 'in-vivo'e stimations [10,11], although reported 'invivo'values vary significantly (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).Recall that both the magnitude of the gathered resonance frequencies as well as the number of resonances peaks on the 'in-vitro' measured mechanical resonance frequencies are relevant with respect to 'in-vivo'observations [4].…”
Section: Mechanical Frequency Response and Parameter Estimationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Simplified theoretical phonation models, likeo ne or twom ass models [1,2,3] are of interest for their limited number of input parameters favouring the relationship with 'in-vivo'physiological variables. Moreover, the incessant development of 'in-vivo'm easurement techniques allows to quantify mechanical 'in-vivo'properties [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some preliminary results have been reported for 2008a͒ show how, in the high pitch range ͑b͒, experienced saxophonists tune a resonance of the tract to select the note to be played ͑the spike near 1000 Hz͒. ͓In the low range ͑a͒, accessible to amateurs, resonance tuning is not needed.͔ very simple systems (Wolfe et al, 2003), but the technical difficulties of producing reliable, reproducible models of human lips are considerable (Fréour et al, 2007;Newton and Campbell, 2007). It is also possible to observe the effect of pressure waves on the motion of vocal folds directly.…”
Section: The Effect Of Acoustic Pressure On the Excitation Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure in the mouthpiece and its relation to the upstream steady pressure have been investigated (Bouhuys, 1965;Yoshikawa, 1995;Fletcher and Tarnopolsky, 1999). Stroboscopy (Martin, 1942;Copley and Strong, 1996;Yoshikawa and Muto, 2003) and high-speed video (Newton et al, 2008;Bromage et al, 2010) have been used to study the motion of the lips directly. The electrical impedance across the lips has been used to study it indirectly (Wolfe and Smith, 2008;Scavone, 2011, 2013), although a variable delay between the variations in electrical impedance across the lips and the lip aperture (Boutin et al, 2014;H ezard et al, 2014) makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%