1990
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199001000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone from the Proximal Femur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
119
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic modulus of bone can be approximated using its mineral density (Fig. 8) (Krischak et al, 1999;Lang et al, 1988;Lotz, Gerhart & Hayes, 1990;Wachter et al, 2001;Wachter et al, 2002).…”
Section: Bone Morphometry 3d Rendering and Solid Modelling For Feamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic modulus of bone can be approximated using its mineral density (Fig. 8) (Krischak et al, 1999;Lang et al, 1988;Lotz, Gerhart & Hayes, 1990;Wachter et al, 2001;Wachter et al, 2002).…”
Section: Bone Morphometry 3d Rendering and Solid Modelling For Feamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike previous empirical studies (181,186,220), the optimized trabecular bone densityelasticity equation from the piecewise relationship of the present study was linear (Etrab = 6.01ρapp). Metatarsals in this study were subjected to cantilever bending, in which the highest stresses would be expected to occur at the cortical bone surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For inhomogeneous material properties, the elastic modulus is typically estimated using empirical equations that relate the bone density to modulus. Such empirical densityelasticity relationships have been identified for the human femur (102,(181)(182)(183)(184)(185), tibia (102,117,(186)(187)(188), pelvis (189), and vertebrae (102,183,(190)(191)(192). The empirical equations have been found to be site-specific (102), and equations for cortical bone are different from equations for trabecular bone within the same gross anatomical location (193).…”
Section: The Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To define the mapping between density and elasticity modulus , we applied different models, namely the ones developed by Wirtz (Wirtz et al 2000), Cody (Cody et al 2000), Lotz (Lotz et al 1990), and Keller (Keller 1994). These models were established based on tests conducted at the scale of the simulated bone samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%