2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of Mo(C)N coatings deposited using cathodic arc evaporation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The root mean square roughness and average grain size of NiFe films were measured and calculated using at least three AFM images as in 66 – 68 . The calculation of average NGs size and other calculations were carried out taking the grains form as a sphere with an equivalent volume as in 67 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root mean square roughness and average grain size of NiFe films were measured and calculated using at least three AFM images as in 66 – 68 . The calculation of average NGs size and other calculations were carried out taking the grains form as a sphere with an equivalent volume as in 67 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface morphology of Zr-Si-N coatings was investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) device HT-206 (produced by MTM Belarus). AFM is the technique to simultaneously study the different surface phenomena, like roughness and friction (Ref [9][10][11][12]. The surface topography was studied using standard CSC38 silicon probe of beam type with the radius of tip curvature less than 10 nm and stiffness of cantilever 0.08 N/m produced by ''Mikromasch'' (Estonia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same displacement into the surface, the indenter produced more permanent plastic deformation in the metallic glass than in the crystalline metals; thus, when the consolidated sample was unloaded, the indenter detached from the metallic glass before the crystalline metals. This may also be connected with the phase transformations and residual deformation of the raw materials [35,36]. In the process of loading, it was easier for the crystalline metal than the metallic glass to form a phase transition, and the residual deformation of the crystalline metal was smaller than that of the metallic glass after unloading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%