2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of 3D printed ceramic cellular materials with triply periodic minimal surface architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4h reviews the mechanical strength of different 3D‐printed ceramics. [ 48–67 ] The data shows that the materials developed in this work exhibited far better mechanical strength. In addition to good mechanical strength, materials thickness with respect to EM absorption performance is also an important factor to evaluate the usefulness of a material absorber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4h reviews the mechanical strength of different 3D‐printed ceramics. [ 48–67 ] The data shows that the materials developed in this work exhibited far better mechanical strength. In addition to good mechanical strength, materials thickness with respect to EM absorption performance is also an important factor to evaluate the usefulness of a material absorber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…With the growth of the PyC into the Al 2 O 3 matrix, the mechanical strength of the PyC‐Al 2 O 3 ceramic composites increased by 27% to 326.7 MPa, which is the highest among all the 3D printed ceramic materials. [ 48–67 ] The improvement of the mechanical strength is explained by the fact that the presence of carbon between the alumina grains significantly change the fracture mode from transgranular to intergranular, as it can be seen from the SEM images in Figure S2 (Supporting Information), besides reducing the porosity in the sample. Moreover, the formation of the carbon phase can support crack deflection, which increases the toughness and hence leads to an improved mechanical strength of a material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the relative foam density is often used in foam‐related equations, this term represents a fraction of the material in foam structure, therefore it could also be replaced by (1− ϕ ) for modeling the scaffolds. According to the experience and review of 3D models, the power‐law relations or Gibson‐Ashby (GA model) and the model developed by Zhu et al for cubic and tetrakaidecahedron geometry, 29,83 should be more adaptable to the scaffold's structure: Enormalf=Enormals()1goodbreak−φ2basedoncubic unit cell Enormalf=Enormals0.7261goodbreak−φ21+1.091φbasedontetrakaidecahedron unit cell …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, that was exactly what happened. The TPMS structures were introduced to alleviate the stress concentrated on the joints [39]. However, this was not the way that things turned out.…”
Section: Effect Of Structural Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%