2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties evaluation of sisal fibre reinforced polymer composites: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
112
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The feasibility and value of the different natural fibers depends on their end-use markets and costs of extraction. These properties make natural fibers able to compete with glass fibers in composite materials [34][35][36]. However, there are some disadvantages that restrict the use of natural fibers in industry, such as incompatibility with specific polymeric matrices, formation of aggregates while processing, and their poor resistance to moisture [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility and value of the different natural fibers depends on their end-use markets and costs of extraction. These properties make natural fibers able to compete with glass fibers in composite materials [34][35][36]. However, there are some disadvantages that restrict the use of natural fibers in industry, such as incompatibility with specific polymeric matrices, formation of aggregates while processing, and their poor resistance to moisture [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A composite acts hydrophilic when the silica surface of the filler is hydroxylase [24]. Hydrophilic nature of the fillers attracts and facilitates the penetration of water within the composite as described by previous researchers [3,23]. The existence of additives in the composite may cause the creation of higher void content due to additional steps involved during the fabrication process [24].…”
Section: A Water Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The values of maximum tensile strength allow the selection of MPF as a possible alternative to be used as reinforcement in bio-composite materials by overcoming fibres (Fig. 4a), such as jute [29], kenaf [30], flax [31], sisal [32] and cotton [33], used in the development of these materials. Although the module obtained shows representative variations with respect to fibres such as flax, hemp, jute, ramie, and kenaf; there are similarities between the MPF and the sisal fibre [34], as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Tensile Test Of the Fibrementioning
confidence: 99%