2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0829-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties and tissue reinforcement of polypropylene grafts used for pelvic floor repair—an experimental study

Abstract: After graft stabilisation, all samples had similar strength, regardless of the significant differences in the pre-implantation values of graft strength.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multifilaments were theoretically supposed to have better elasticity, but the same results are achieved with low weight monofilaments 4,5 . After an initial polypropylene testing, some advances in biocompatibility were to be revealed experimentally on a polypropylene-coated field.…”
Section: Experimental Studies and Mesh Behaviormentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multifilaments were theoretically supposed to have better elasticity, but the same results are achieved with low weight monofilaments 4,5 . After an initial polypropylene testing, some advances in biocompatibility were to be revealed experimentally on a polypropylene-coated field.…”
Section: Experimental Studies and Mesh Behaviormentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In analyzing the literature, it is obvious that rats are the most commonly accepted experimental model. Several study groups have set the standard for methods as well as tissue analysis and tensile strength in experimental studies 4,5 . Primary repair of fullthickness abdominal wall defect, with respect to the peritoneum, seems like a logical choice.…”
Section: Experimental Studies and Mesh Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other main finding of this study is that there is little to no correlation between flexural and tensile properties of surgical mesh (Figure ). The majority of prior mechanical testing of surgical mesh has been focused on either tensile stiffness or loads necessary to result in mesh failure . While important to understanding the overall mechanical behavior, failure‐level forces are likely never experienced in vivo as physiologic levels of stress in the abdominal cavity and pelvic floor are well below the minimum levels necessary to cause mechanical failure of surgical mesh .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh stiffness values were reported as force divided by deformation (N/mm) . Investigators examining the mechanical properties of surgical meshes have focused primarily on tensile strength and how it relates to mesh characteristics such as filament diameter, density, and knit pattern . This type of testing, however, provides information only on the tensile loads at which the meshes will fail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation