2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties and austenite stability in hot-rolled 0.2C–1.6/3.2Al–6Mn–Fe TRIP steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the manganese content rises, the initial microstructure (after cold rolling) changes to low-C martensite [2]. Medium-Mn steels can be obtained as cold-rolled [5] or hot-rolled [6] sheets. For lightweight applications in the automotive industry, cold-rolled coated sheet products are of particular interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the manganese content rises, the initial microstructure (after cold rolling) changes to low-C martensite [2]. Medium-Mn steels can be obtained as cold-rolled [5] or hot-rolled [6] sheets. For lightweight applications in the automotive industry, cold-rolled coated sheet products are of particular interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the hot-working and cooling to room temperature (a quenching step), the martensitic or ferritic-martensitic microstructure is subjected to intercritical annealing. The fine-grained lath-type ferrite-austenite mixture is formed under such annealing conditions [6]. For such small grain sizes of the austenite and its Mn contents higher than 7%, the stable austenite is retained at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, some blocky austenite in 2Al and 4Al samples was divided by α-ferrite into lamellar morphology with different thickness and length. It was further confirmed that Mn and C were non-uniformly distributed in lamellar austenite leading to discontinuous TRIP effect, which contributed to enhancement of strength and WH[21,[31][32][33]. However, based on the EPMA / EDS results, Mn and C were distributed uniformly in austenite in 6Al steel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The WHR decreased rapidly in stage 1 (S1), remained rather stable until its fluctuation in S2, then varied considerably as true strain increased in S3, and finally decreased in a serrated manner in S4. The WHR performance in four stages can be explained by: soft phase ferrite underwent considerable yield deformation in the early stage of plastic deformation (S1) [22,23]; there was a competition between the strength increasing effect caused by the TRIP effect of retained austenite and the softening effect of ferrite deformation (S2) [24]; the progressive TRIP effect of retained austenite caused the strength increasing effect to overcome the softening effect of ferrite deformation (S3) [25][26][27][28]; and the austenite TRIP effect was exhausted due to its negation, similar to S1, at the end of the strain (S4). It was noteworthy that the WHR peaks nearly disappeared with serrated behavior in S4.…”
Section: Austenite Stability and Work-hardening Behavoirmentioning
confidence: 99%