2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical performance of monolithic materials cemented to a dentin-like substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, DD cubeX 2 and VITA Enamic exhibited the highest strength values, whereas IPS e.max CAD and VITA Suprinity had the lowest. Our results differ from those obtained by some studies where VITA Suprinity showed the highest strength values, followed by IPS e.max CAD and VITA Enamic; however, this can be attributed to the different sample preparation, ageing, and loading methods used [4,6,24,29]. VITA Enamic is characterised by a secondary polymerised monomer infiltrated with a pre-sintered glass-ceramic, resulting in a true skeleton structure that facilitates effective stress distribution in all directions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, DD cubeX 2 and VITA Enamic exhibited the highest strength values, whereas IPS e.max CAD and VITA Suprinity had the lowest. Our results differ from those obtained by some studies where VITA Suprinity showed the highest strength values, followed by IPS e.max CAD and VITA Enamic; however, this can be attributed to the different sample preparation, ageing, and loading methods used [4,6,24,29]. VITA Enamic is characterised by a secondary polymerised monomer infiltrated with a pre-sintered glass-ceramic, resulting in a true skeleton structure that facilitates effective stress distribution in all directions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This inconsistency was also observed in studies examining the biaxial flexural strength of bonded monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials [4,6,27,28]. On the other hand, consistent results were obtained by comparative studies of the biaxial flexural strength of IPS e.max CAD and that of VITA Enamic, with the latter system exhibiting lower strength than the former system whether it was bonded to dentin analogues or left unbonded [4,9,24,26,29]. More studies on monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials are clearly needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An in vitro study reported that a feldspathic ceramic had the best fatigue behavior when cemented to a dentin‐like substrate in comparison to lithium disilicate, polymer infiltrated ceramic and a nanohybrid composite resin (Weitzel et al, 2020 ). Also, they reported that a complete ceramic crown could result in a different stress scenario and may lead to different results from those that they obtained in their study (44 MPa).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the many advantages of monolithic ceramic crowns, they still have limitations such as fragility and surface machining and ease of repairing. 1,2 Numerical simulation is a strong tool for predicting the fracture pattern of engineered materials and analyzing their damage behavior. [3][4][5][6] Smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is one of the most robust computational methods employed to simulate solid mechanics 7 and fluid flows developed by Gingold, Monaghan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%