2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical performance of FRP-confined and unconfined crumb rubber concrete containing high rubber content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the choice of these parameters for every formulation was different case-by-case, often showing inconsistent values, thus making the numerical values here extrapolated extremely wide and difficult to compare. For instance, Youssf et al [65], series 22A, declared a specific gravity for crumb rubber equal to 0.85, which is outside the values observed in the literature for vulcanized rubber. As another example, Gesoglu et al [51], series 8A, use tire chips with specific gravity 1.02 and crumb rubber with specific gravity of 0.83 and 0.48.…”
Section: Bibliography Data Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the choice of these parameters for every formulation was different case-by-case, often showing inconsistent values, thus making the numerical values here extrapolated extremely wide and difficult to compare. For instance, Youssf et al [65], series 22A, declared a specific gravity for crumb rubber equal to 0.85, which is outside the values observed in the literature for vulcanized rubber. As another example, Gesoglu et al [51], series 8A, use tire chips with specific gravity 1.02 and crumb rubber with specific gravity of 0.83 and 0.48.…”
Section: Bibliography Data Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, both the x-axis and the y-axis do not present comparable data. Considering the compression strength, it is evident in Figure 1 that, for instance, the values at 10% rubber substitution that are in the 50-70 MPa range (series 15A, 20A, 22A, 24A [59,63,65,67]) are Considering the compression strength, it is evident in Figure 1 that, for instance, the values at 10% rubber substitution that are in the 50-70 MPa range (series 15A, 20A, 22A, 24A [59,63,65,67]) are very high mostly due to the use of high-strength concrete. Other series, for instance 7A and 7B [50], have a much lower reduction in strength, but since their reference concrete has a lower strength, they seem less performing with strength values in the 20-35 MPa range.…”
Section: Bibliography Data Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of rubber particles in concrete modifies its microstructure, which directly influences the interlocking behaviour between rebar ribs and concrete keys and consequently the splitting and crushing actions near the interface region. Additionally, the mechanical properties of rubberised concrete under external confinement are strongly modified for high rubber replacements [44][45][46], hence the bond behaviour of deformed bars in confined rubberised concrete is also expected to change. Although some information exists on rebar-rubberised concrete interface behaviour, it is limited to bond strengths rather than the full bond-slip behaviour, whilst the influence of confinement has not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of studies have been conducted for partial replacement of mineral aggregate by rubber content in concrete [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Low compressive and tensile strength as compared to normal concrete was reported by the addition of rubber particles in concrete [11,12]. However, the amount of damage caused by the addition of rubber in compressive strength of rubberized concrete is dependent on the size, and type of rubber replacement [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%