2014
DOI: 10.1590/1516-1439.210413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical performance of concrete with incorporation of coarse waste from the marble industry

Abstract: The waste resulting from marble extraction process is usually disposed of in landfills or dumps and its accumulation is causing serious environmental and landscaping problems. One way of reusing marble waste is to consider its incorporation in structural concrete as a non-primary aggregate. This research work attempts to alleviate the situation and provide information on the mechanical performance of concrete as a function of the replacement ratio of primary aggregates (PA) with coarse waste marble aggregates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have attempted to use marble waste particulates in paver blocks [ 19 ], soil stabilization [ 11 , 20 ], cement-based adhesive mortar [ 21 ], and as a replacement of conventional natural aggregates in concrete [ 4 , 8 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Attempts have also been made to use marble waste for manufacturing cementitious roofing tiles [ 26 ], preparing polymer concrete with unsaturated pre-accelerated polyester resin [ 27 ], a cement-based composite material with expanded perlite and tragacanth (plant resin) [ 28 ], composite bricks [ 2 , 6 , 29 ], artificial stones, unsaturated polyester resin, and epoxy resin as binders [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have attempted to use marble waste particulates in paver blocks [ 19 ], soil stabilization [ 11 , 20 ], cement-based adhesive mortar [ 21 ], and as a replacement of conventional natural aggregates in concrete [ 4 , 8 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Attempts have also been made to use marble waste for manufacturing cementitious roofing tiles [ 26 ], preparing polymer concrete with unsaturated pre-accelerated polyester resin [ 27 ], a cement-based composite material with expanded perlite and tragacanth (plant resin) [ 28 ], composite bricks [ 2 , 6 , 29 ], artificial stones, unsaturated polyester resin, and epoxy resin as binders [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research, however, is not unanimous in relation to the effects of the aggregate replacement in compressive and splitting tensile strength and definite conclusions cannot be drawn. Additionally, [25] also observed that the elasticity modulus is slightly impacted (more on limestone and basalt and less in granite concretes) by the marble waste addition. As to durability concerns, [24] states that, despite the fact that water absorption by immersion does not appear to display significant changes with the rise in marble content, absorption by capillarity decreased.…”
Section: Marble Wastesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This fragility can lead to the lower durability of concretes possessing these wastes. Regarding the workability of the concretes, the literature suggests that this property is not negatively influenced by the coarse aggregate replacement and may even be improved by this practice [24,25]. The research, however, is not unanimous in relation to the effects of the aggregate replacement in compressive and splitting tensile strength and definite conclusions cannot be drawn.…”
Section: Marble Wastesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compressive strength of the concrete mixes increased by 35% and 26%, respectively at 80% and 100% replacement level of conventional coarse aggregate. Martins et al (2014) reported that, coarse aggregate from marble waste can be used as a partial replacement for conventional coarse aggregate to improve the mechanical properties of concrete. They also reported that, the workability of all concrete mixes increased by 4.16%, 2.08%, 9.34% and density marginally decreased by 0.28%, 1.49% and 4.21% at 20%, 50% and 100% replacement level respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%