2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical performance and fatigue life prediction of lattice structures: Parametric computational approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The star regular curve was above the earlier mentioned bending‐dominated structures, and the cubic regular structures, purely stretching dominated, have the highest fatigue strength. Similar behavior in the normalized S–N curve was observed when comparing BCC, simple cubic (SC)‐BCC, and face‐centered cubic (FCC) structures with SC structure by Peng et al 55 The normalized S–N curve shown in Figure 9B indicates that the fatigue curve of star regular and cross regular overlaps with each other. While, the irregular and trabecular specimens except cross irregular have a certain overlap at the lower end of the graph.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The star regular curve was above the earlier mentioned bending‐dominated structures, and the cubic regular structures, purely stretching dominated, have the highest fatigue strength. Similar behavior in the normalized S–N curve was observed when comparing BCC, simple cubic (SC)‐BCC, and face‐centered cubic (FCC) structures with SC structure by Peng et al 55 The normalized S–N curve shown in Figure 9B indicates that the fatigue curve of star regular and cross regular overlaps with each other. While, the irregular and trabecular specimens except cross irregular have a certain overlap at the lower end of the graph.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In this study, the fatigue strength of cubic regular structure reported is 100 MPa with a porosity of ~76% and as‐designed strut thickness of ~450 μm. Considering the difference in other parameters such as microstructure and heat treatment, the estimated fatigue strength of cubic regular is similar but slightly higher when compared to Zhao et al 36 The fatigue strength of 3.1 MPa obtained from cross‐shaped structures is very close to the fatigue strength of 2.5 MPa reported by Peng et al 55 from the fatigue life prediction of body‐centered cubic (BCC) (85% porosity) using finite element analysis. Irregularity had a predominant impact which reduced the fatigue strength by almost 10 times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The star regular curve was above the earlier mentioned bending dominated structures, and the cubic regular structures, purely stretching dominated, have the highest fatigue strength. Similar behavior in the normalized S-N curve was observed when comparing BCC, SC-BCC and FCC structures with simple cubic (SC) structure by Peng et al 55 . The normalized S-N curve shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fatigue Testsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…al. 55 from the fatigue life prediction of BCC (85% porosity) using finite element analysis. Irregularity had a predominant impact which reduced the fatigue strength by almost ten times.…”
Section: Fatigue Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a mimic of nature cellular material, lattice material is designed with its unit cells arranged periodically along tessellation directions. Metallic lattice materials can provide excellent mechanical properties, e.g., ultra light weight, better durability, high specific strength and stiffness, and a superior energy absorption capability [1][2][3][4]. Methods for lattice material design can be generally classified into two categories, i.e., manual generation and mathematical generation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%