1987
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90289-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical, morphological and biochemical adaptations of bone and muscle to hindlimb suspension and exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical tests on the proximal femur and cortical bone samples indicated that tail suspension for 28 days significantly weakened bone, in agreement with previous studies (3,34,36,37). These results support the idea that tail suspension is a good model for skeletal disuse atrophy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical tests on the proximal femur and cortical bone samples indicated that tail suspension for 28 days significantly weakened bone, in agreement with previous studies (3,34,36,37). These results support the idea that tail suspension is a good model for skeletal disuse atrophy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…When mechanical tests are performed on an entire bone segment, they reflect the bone structural properties; when standardized samples are used, the resulting information reflects the characteristics of bone as a tissue (34,35). The mechanical tests on the proximal femur and cortical bone samples indicated that tail suspension for 28 days significantly weakened bone, in agreement with previous studies (3,34,36,37).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, in immobilized turkey radii, more than half (+58%) of the disuse-induced increase in porosity occurred within the ventral/caudal quadrant of the cortex [35]. Similarly, hindlimb suspension decreased the cortical thickness of the anterior quadrant (but not other quadrants) in the femur of hindlimb suspended rats which lowered whole bone strength [45]. In contrast, there were no significant differences in porosity or cortical thickness between anatomical quadrants for hibernating or active grizzly bears, suggesting that hibernation did not cause localized bone structural changes in a focused region of the femoral cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without adequate control for the effects of body size, skeletal traits may appear to vary significantly among groups that experience different exercise regimens when the groups differ primarily in body size alone. Some studies on the effect of exercise or loading on bone do include body mass in statistical analyses (e.g., Gordon et al, 1989;Kannus et al, 1995;Järvinen et al, 2003;Binkley and Specker, 2004), but many do not, even when body mass differs significantly between control and treatment groups (e.g., Shaw et al, 1987;Niehoff et al, 2004;Wu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Morphometrics -Importance Of Body Massmentioning
confidence: 99%