Emerging Lithographic Technologies VI 2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.472290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical modeling of the reticle and chuck for EUV lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Martin et al have modeled this case, which clearly shows that the specification of thermal expansion of the substrate material should take into account that the mask and its chuck are a system. 10 …”
Section: MMmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Martin et al have modeled this case, which clearly shows that the specification of thermal expansion of the substrate material should take into account that the mask and its chuck are a system. 10 …”
Section: MMmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Low stress absorbers are being developed by Racette et al 52 A SEMI standard for mask mounting is being discussed to address this issue. Martin et al 53 have studied aspects of chuck design that might help guide standardization. One approach would be to standardize the properties of the chuck in each of the e-beam, metrology and exposure tool.…”
Section: Mask Pattern Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the previous studies have provided insight into the effects of fractal dimension, material properties, and surface adhesion on the loss of material by adhesive wear, the developed wear models are extensions of Archard's model and, therefore, can only be applied to sliding surfaces. However, experimental evidence (Martin et al, 2002) and molecular dynamics simulations (Bhushan et al, 1995) have shown that adhesive wear can occur even in the absence of relative slip between the contacting surfaces. Hence, a comprehensive adhesive wear theory of rough surfaces in normal contact is necessary to bridge this gap of knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%