2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.014203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical hole-burning spectroscopy: Demonstration of hole burning in the terminal relaxation regime

Abstract: We have developed a mechanical spectral hole-burning ͑MSHB͒ scheme that is analogous to dielectric and magnetic spectral hole-burning techniques. Previous dielectric nonresonant spectral hole-burning experiments have been performed close to the glass temperatures of glass-forming materials and interpreted in terms of dynamic heterogeneity. The present study focuses on polymeric systems far above the glass temperature and in the terminal ͑reptation͒ regime. Theoretically, we examine Kaye-Bernstein-Kearsley-Zapa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons that the stress relaxation‐based predictions are so high are unclear and deviations could be nonuniversal. For example, Shi and McKenna [ 82 ] found reasonable agreement for a low density polyethylene using the stress relaxation approach, with deviations being such that the data were above the predictions, different from the Giacomin et al [ 111 ] data of Figure 23. Differences of this sort suggest that the FTR type of analysis predicting certain trends, for example, in I3/I1 versus γ2 due to the form of the constitutive model, are of interest, but the issue of finding quantitative agreement with the LAOS data itself as well as data from other deformation histories can be problematic.…”
Section: Dynamic Heterogeneity and Nonlinear Viscoelasticity In Polymersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The reasons that the stress relaxation‐based predictions are so high are unclear and deviations could be nonuniversal. For example, Shi and McKenna [ 82 ] found reasonable agreement for a low density polyethylene using the stress relaxation approach, with deviations being such that the data were above the predictions, different from the Giacomin et al [ 111 ] data of Figure 23. Differences of this sort suggest that the FTR type of analysis predicting certain trends, for example, in I3/I1 versus γ2 due to the form of the constitutive model, are of interest, but the issue of finding quantitative agreement with the LAOS data itself as well as data from other deformation histories can be problematic.…”
Section: Dynamic Heterogeneity and Nonlinear Viscoelasticity In Polymersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The pulse‐probe sequences used are shown in Figures 16A,B shows how the vertical and horizontal holes are determined. [ 81–83 ] The relevant equations describing the response are: Gpos(),γtgoodbreak=Gpump(),γtgoodbreak+Gγtmod Gneg(),γtgoodbreak=Gpump(),γtgoodbreak−Gγtmod Gmod(),γtgoodbreak=Gpos(),γtGneg(),γt2 where Gpos(),γt0.25emand0.25emGneg(),γt are the measured relaxation responses in the positive and negative directions after the large pump sinewave, Gpump(),γt is the after effect of the applied sinewave, and Gmod(),γt is the modified response of interest and that is compared to the linear response of the system without application of the large amplitude pump. Then, G()t=Glinear()tGmod()t represents the vertical hole.…”
Section: Dynamic Heterogeneity and Nonlinear Viscoelasticity In Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations