“…Due to the lower percentage of martensitic transformation associated with elevated test temperatures, a higher fatigue life is observed. NiTi alloys Melton and Mercier (1979b) 10 3 6 N f 6 10 4 (5% P e t P 4%) Ni50.1Ti49.9 and Ni50.3Ti49.7; pseudoelastic cycling under stress control; different alloy compositions and applied heat treatments result in different fatigue life McNichols et al (1981) 7 · 10 3 6 N f 6 2 · 10 5 (8.3% P e t P 4.4%) Ni50Ti50; thermal cycling; strong linear correlation between the cycles to failure and the applied cyclic strain amplitude Miyazaki (1990) and Miyazaki et al (1999) 10 2 6 N f 6 10 5 (3.5% P e t P 2%) Ni50Ti50 and Ti50Ni40Cu10; pseudoelastic cycling under strain control; maximum recovery strain and stress hysteresis decrease with increasing Cu content; fatigue life for both alloys increases with decreasing testing temperature Bigeon and Morin (1996) 10 6 N f 6 10 4 (50 MPa 6 r 6 800 MPa) Ti48.8Ni45.2Cu6; thermal cycling; reduction of the applied stress rapidly increases the fatigue life Tobushi et al (1997Tobushi et al ( , 1998 10 2 6 N f 6 10 4 (1.4% 6 e t 6 3%) Ni50.2Ti49.8; pseudoelastic cycling under strain control; fatigue life increases with decrease of testing temperatures; longer fatigue life: 10 5 6 N f 6 10 7 (0.5% 6 e t 6 1%) is observed for the R-phase transformation Lagoudas et al (2000) and Bertacchini et al (2003) 10 3 6 N f 6 5 · 10 4 (54 MPa 6 r < 247 MPa) Ni50Ti40Cu10; thermal cycling; transformation strain is in the range 2% 6 e t 6 4%; fatigue life increases for smaller transformation strains and stress levels; heat treatments also influence the fatigue life Cu based alloys Melton and Mercier (1979a) 5 · 10 4 6 N f 6 10 5 Cu68.1Znl8.2Al13.7; pseudoelastic cycling under strain control; increasing M s induces longer fatigue life; stress-induced range used is 30 MPa 6 r 6 100 MPa Sure and Brown (1985) 3 · 10 3 6 N f 6 5 · 10 4 (0.8% P e t P 0.5%) Cu69.2Al27.6Ni3.2; pseudoelastic cycling under stress control; stress-induced range used is 15 MPa 6 r 6 280 MPa; grain size growth reduces fatigue: for grain size of %150 lm, 3 · 10 3 6 N f 6 5 · 10 3 , while for grain size %20 lm the number of cycles to failure is N f % 5 · 10 4 Morin and Trivero (1994) N f % 10 4 (r % 100 MPa) Cu69.5Al26.8Ni3.7; thermal cycling; e t % 2.5%; very low influence of thermal cycling on SME and transformation temperatures; significant creep-like deformation observed during the first 1000 cycles Bigeon and Morin (1996) N f 6 10 3 (10 MPa 6 r 6 200 MPa) Cu75Zn11Al14; thermal cycling; transformation strain range is e t 6 7%; reduction of the applied stress rapidly increases the fatigue life Lu et al (1996) 4 · 10 3 6 N f 6 2.1 · 10 4 Cu77.5Zn17.5Al5; pseudoelastic cycling under strain control; fatigue life decreases for higher annealing temperatures, while slower cooling rates increase it; pre-straining structural elements impacts the fatigue life…”