2010
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3181c29bde
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Evaluation of a 4-mm Cancellous “Rescue” Screw in Osteoporotic Cortical Bone: A Cadaveric Study

Abstract: There seems to be no advantage in using a cancellous screw over a cortical screw in bicortical fixation in osteoporotic bone. Although the rescue screw provided greater pullout strength than the stripped screw, it is unknown if the purchase it provides is clinically sufficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other studies, rescue screws only moderately increase pullout strength [2,14]. Wire augmentation has also been described to increase pullout force [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other studies, rescue screws only moderately increase pullout strength [2,14]. Wire augmentation has also been described to increase pullout force [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are options to repair stripped screws [2,9,14], but each of them has important shortcomings. Because of this, we investigated a HFIA material used to increase pullout strength of stripped screws, assessing augmentation and repair applicability of HFIA in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic bone models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Osteoporotic bone has more chance of loss of purchase due to relatively weak bone leading to a less stable construct [1,22]. Also, using a larger diameter screw does not solve the problem [23].…”
Section: Fibula Nail/ Intramedullary Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the incidence of screw loosening, various groups have focused on improving screw/plate technologies, [8][9][10][11] among other approaches including bone cements, materials from the operating room and high friction surface coatings. [12][13][14] Many of these efforts are mechanical solutions implemented intraoperatively and carry additional sets of risks such as undue bone-implant pressure, compromised bone stability or increased bone removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%