Mechanical design and kinematic analysis of a medical robot assisted maxillofacial surgery

Duan, Xingguang; Wang, Yonggui; Kong, Xiangzhan; Li, Meng; Yang, Yang

doi:10.1109/iccme.2013.6548320

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…and 1.47±1.16 degrees. The second surgical robot was tested on a model in the range of 0.7188 to 1.3262 mm, and the error in animal experiments (sheep) averaged 1.17 mm on 1 side of the ascending mandible and 2.475 mm on the other side 49–53. In 2013, Weber and colleagues developed a cranial drill for cochlear cranial drilling surgical robot for cochlear implantation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second surgical robot was tested on a model in the range of 0.7188 to 1.3262 mm, and the error in animal experiments (sheep) averaged 1.17 mm on 1 side of the ascending mandible and 2.475 mm on the other side. [49][50][51][52][53] In 2013, Weber and colleagues developed a cranial drill for cochlear cranial drilling surgical robot for cochlear implantation. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed that the robot drilled holes as close as 1.0 and 0.3 mm from the facial nerve and tympanic cord, respectively.…”

Section: History Of Craniomaxillofacial Robotic-assisted Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Advances in Robot-Assisted Surgery for Facial Bone Contouring Surgery

Lin

Zhao

Han

et al. 2022

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since our team reported the application of robot-assisted surgery in facial contouring surgery in 2020, further clinical trials with large samples have been conducted. This paper will report the interim results of a single-center, large-sample randomized controlled trial of the first robot developed by our team for facial contouring surgery. Meanwhile, this research field will be systematically reviewed and prospected.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%