2018
DOI: 10.1249/jes.0000000000000132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Coupling Between Muscle-Tendon Units Reduces Peak Stresses

Abstract: The presence of mechanical linkages between synergistic muscles and their common tendons may distribute forces among the involved structures. We review studies, using humans and other animals, examining muscle and tendon interactions and discuss the hypothesis that connections between muscle bellies and within tendons may serve as a mechanism to distribute forces and mitigate peak stresses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a direct relationship between individual muscle contributions and force distribution across the Achilles tendon has been demonstrated on cadaver preparations (Arndt et al, 1999). Despite it being tempting to conclude that the large individual differences in force-sharing strategies that we report directly translate to individual differences in Achilles subtendon loading, intermuscular force transmission between the heads of the triceps surae may result in a redistribution of force between the Achilles subtendons, as recently suggested (Maas and Finni, 2018). It is also possible that every subtendon exhibits different mechanical properties (related to their elastic modulus, cross-sectional area, length) and that these properties vary between individuals.…”
Section: Coupling Between Muscle Activation and Pcsasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, a direct relationship between individual muscle contributions and force distribution across the Achilles tendon has been demonstrated on cadaver preparations (Arndt et al, 1999). Despite it being tempting to conclude that the large individual differences in force-sharing strategies that we report directly translate to individual differences in Achilles subtendon loading, intermuscular force transmission between the heads of the triceps surae may result in a redistribution of force between the Achilles subtendons, as recently suggested (Maas and Finni, 2018). It is also possible that every subtendon exhibits different mechanical properties (related to their elastic modulus, cross-sectional area, length) and that these properties vary between individuals.…”
Section: Coupling Between Muscle Activation and Pcsasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…First, altering relative muscle force contributions from different heads of triceps surae may not appreciably affect relative displacements of different tissue regions. This could be explained by lateral force transmission within the Achilles tendon or via intermuscular myofascial structures that would serve to limit non‐uniform distribution of forces within the Achilles tendon and differential displacements of the tissue regions—a hypothesis recently presented by Maas & Finni . The hypothesis that alterations in triceps surae muscle forces induce only limited changes in Achilles tendon non‐uniform motion due to lateral force transmission is supported by a recent experiment in rat in which isolated contractions of different triceps surae muscles via electrical stimulations resulted in only small variations in displacements of the subtendons .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The results, however, differ between studies, with decrease, increase, and no changes in SO fascicle length reported (reviewed in Ref. 46). In one study, the magnitude of epimuscular forces was estimated to be maximally Ϸ12% of that of passive gastrocnemius (74).…”
Section: Muscle Strains As a Measure Of Epimuscular Myofascial Loads mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The strain and stress of these linkages are dependent on the relative position of the muscle bellies (44). Despite the fact that the presence of this additional pathway has been reported for several different muscle groups throughout the body (24) and in several animal species [i.e., mouse (33), rat (43), Xenopus laevis (31), locust (56), chicken (5), cat (51), and human (69)], the physiological significance of epimuscular pathways is still subject to debate (20,46,81). Whether these pathways can be considered significant will depend on the relative magnitude of epimuscular forces during in vivo muscle conditions (see below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation