1994
DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90051-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical changes in macro-porous calcium phosphate ceramics after implantation in bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This bioactivity is related to its structure, which has both microand macroporosity. 4,37,[41][42] The micropores with a diameter of less than 10 m allow fluid circulation, leading to the dissolution and degradation of the biomaterial. The macropores with a diameter of about 100 m act as a scaffold for bone cells, thus allowing centripetal bone ingrowth (from the periphery to the center of the implant).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This bioactivity is related to its structure, which has both microand macroporosity. 4,37,[41][42] The micropores with a diameter of less than 10 m allow fluid circulation, leading to the dissolution and degradation of the biomaterial. The macropores with a diameter of about 100 m act as a scaffold for bone cells, thus allowing centripetal bone ingrowth (from the periphery to the center of the implant).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this period, the ceramic degraded by a disso- lution-precipitation process, as previously demonstrated by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM). 21,37,41,45 The dissolution and reprecipitation of biological apatite occurs inside the micropores of the MBCP ceramic. The first cells to arrive-macrophages-are rapidly replaced by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which produce and remodel bone in the ceramic implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Although faster ingrowth is favored by a more porous, interconnected structure, denser ceramics have better mechanical integrity. Biomechanical testing of retrieved implants has shown that newly integrated bone has a significant reinforcing effect on porous ceramic bone graft substitute materials, 20,21 and testing of longer term implants has generally shown retention of this conferred mechanical integrity. 9,12,13,22 Thus, for clinical application, a ceramic bone graft substitute should have sufficient mechanical integrity to survive the implantation procedure and attain positional stability while maintaining its open porous structure before integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantation in weightbearing zones does not appear to be a problem, providing that the area is sufficiently reinforced with internal fixation. It is interesting to note that Trécant et al [39] using a biphasic ceramic found that, following implantation, there was a significant increase in the compressive strength of the "composite" formed by the transformed ceramic and the newly formed bone. Bouler et al [3] found the mechanical strength of biphasic ceramics to be affected by macroporosity (which decreases the compressive strength) and the sintering temperature (which increases the compressive strength).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%