“…Guidelines for RAC are needed since RAs are different from coarse natural aggregates (NAs), changing the properties of concrete. The main differences between NAs and RAs are the following: - NAs are composed of particles of a single type of stone (limestone, granite and basalt are the most common), while RAs are composed of a mix of several constituents (concrete, mortar, unbound stone, ceramics, glass, and other deleterious contaminants) of different quality and properties [ 6 , 7 ];
- This implies that, in general, RAs are weaker, more deformable, more porous and have larger water absorption than NAs [ 8 , 9 ];
- At the same time, the mechanical and durability properties of concrete are detrimentally affected by the incorporation of RAs: for the same compressive strength, RAC is typically found to have a smaller Young’s modulus, larger creep and shrinkage and worse durability properties [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Fracture energy and tensile strength are also detrimentally affected, especially when the strength class of concrete is larger [ 12 , 13 ];
- Regarding the structural behaviour of reinforced concrete, the use of RAs is found to result in larger short- and long-term deflections [ 14 , 15 ].
…”