2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-1895(01)00017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behaviour and failure mode of bentheim sandstone under triaxial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
146
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
17
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the result of Baud et al [2]. Klein et al [20] speculated that relatively homogeneous mineralogy and well-sorted grain sizes of Bentheim sandstone were preferential to develop discrete compaction bands. However, Diemelstadt sandstone has a similar porosity with Bentheim sandstone and relatively dispersive grain sizes, but it has a similar type of compaction bands with Bentheim sandstone.…”
Section: Relationship Between Different Types Of Compaction Bandssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with the result of Baud et al [2]. Klein et al [20] speculated that relatively homogeneous mineralogy and well-sorted grain sizes of Bentheim sandstone were preferential to develop discrete compaction bands. However, Diemelstadt sandstone has a similar porosity with Bentheim sandstone and relatively dispersive grain sizes, but it has a similar type of compaction bands with Bentheim sandstone.…”
Section: Relationship Between Different Types Of Compaction Bandssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The main reasons are that the porosities are much higher and the cementation strengths are much weaker compared to the rocks used in other experiments. The porosities of sandstones used in other experiments were 13%-28% [2,6,20,22]. However, the porosities are 19%-44% in this study.…”
Section: Factors Promote Compaction Band Formationcontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, field evidence related to compaction localization generally shows that CBs typically form in lightly cemented or uncemented sandy materials, subjected to a vertical overburden ranging from a few MPa to 30 MPa and to pore pressures of less than 13 MPa, at undisturbed (initial) porosities of n 0 = 10-25% [Holcomb et al, 2007], and permeability κ between 2 and 20 darcies (i.e., saturated hydraulic conductivities in the Fossen et al, 2011]. CBs' thicknesses are typically less than 1.5 cm [Holcomb et al, 2007;Stefanou and Sulem, 2014] and the CB formation can bring about in highly porous materials a porosity reduction of 10% to 20% [Olsson, 2001;Klein et al, 2001;Holcomb et al, 2007], corresponding to a volumetric deformation larger than 10%, relative to the surrounding uncompacted material.…”
Section: Dynamical Effects In the Cb Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%