2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.589-590.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Behaviors Analysis and Johnson-Cook Model Establishment of 4Cr13 Stainless Steel

Abstract: The stress-strain curves, mechanical behaviors, and Johnson-Cook model of 4Cr13 stainless steel were investigated at both the strain rates from 0.001s-1 to 7000s-1 and the temperatures from 293K to 673K based on the electronic universal testing machine and the split Hopkinson bar. The results showed that 4Cr13 stainless steel was very sensitive to the temperature and the strain rate. The temperature sensitivity factor decreased with increasing the temperature, and the strain rate sensitivity factor increased w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new model improved on prior work [17] by including failure criteria to examine the damage evolution in the ball bearing. The Johnson-Cook strength parameters and maximum principal stress failure criteria used for the SS420 [29] are presented in Table 3. Numerical pressure gauges were placed at 0.4 mm intervals across the rear face of the blast tube and gauges were placed at regular intervals inside the ball bearing to examine the stress fluctuations at four approximate locations within the bearing during the blast event and subsequent flight (indicated in Figure 4b).…”
Section: Modelling the Ball Bearing Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new model improved on prior work [17] by including failure criteria to examine the damage evolution in the ball bearing. The Johnson-Cook strength parameters and maximum principal stress failure criteria used for the SS420 [29] are presented in Table 3. Numerical pressure gauges were placed at 0.4 mm intervals across the rear face of the blast tube and gauges were placed at regular intervals inside the ball bearing to examine the stress fluctuations at four approximate locations within the bearing during the blast event and subsequent flight (indicated in Figure 4b).…”
Section: Modelling the Ball Bearing Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%