2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior of Σ tilt grain boundaries in nanoscale Cu and Al: A quasicontinuum study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
130
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
16
130
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are not so many ab initio results of metallic GBs using LDA (local density approximation) or GGA as compared with classical computations using the embedded-atom method. 34,35) For Cu GBs, the boundary energies are 1270 mJ/m 2 (GGA) for the {210}/ [001] AE ¼ 5 tilt GB, 36) 22) and 502 mJ/m 2 for the {210}/[001] AE ¼ 5 tilt GB. 40) At least on the energy range, the agreement between our results and these results is good.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Ab Initio Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are not so many ab initio results of metallic GBs using LDA (local density approximation) or GGA as compared with classical computations using the embedded-atom method. 34,35) For Cu GBs, the boundary energies are 1270 mJ/m 2 (GGA) for the {210}/ [001] AE ¼ 5 tilt GB, 36) 22) and 502 mJ/m 2 for the {210}/[001] AE ¼ 5 tilt GB. 40) At least on the energy range, the agreement between our results and these results is good.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Ab Initio Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the interested reader, some recent works have calculated the structures and energies for symmetric/asymmetric tilt/twist/ mixed character grain boundaries in Cu, Ni, and/or Al; [193][194][195] in particular, Olmsted et al 193 explored 388 distinct Ni and Al boundaries to ascertain relationships with grain boundary energy and grain boundary mobility. 196 These methods have been extended from energies to calculating the properties of individual grain boundaries in an effort to understand grain boundary mechanics, such as dislocation nucleation, [115][116][117][118]197 grain boundary sliding, 198 spall strength, 199,200 fracture, 201 and GBdislocation interactions. 202,203 In many cases, it was found that the grain boundary properties are not simply governed by the crystallographic orientations of the adjacent grains (e.g., see Ref.…”
Section: Grain Boundary (Bicrystal) MD Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QC approach is a well-established method in the study of GB deformation in bicrystals as shown by past works [29,30]. In particular, the QC method was used in the very first study reporting the important role of E structural units in mediating GB sliding and GB-mediated dislocation nucleation, confirmed later by more complex MD simulations at finite temperature [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, this latter study did not specifically address the impact of vacancies on the deformation modes and mechanical response of GBs. Also, atomistic simulations using the quasicontinuum (QC) method [27,28] have been performed to study the shearing of perfect crystalline interfaces with no defects [27,[29][30][31], as well as the effect of nanovoids in single crystals, i.e. without considering GBs [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%