2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for cyclic loading, the number of cycles and the force exceeded 1 200 000 cycles with a 49-N or 98-N force, as are commonly applied. [28][29][30] Even though relatively higher loads were applied in the present study, the fact that no failures occurred during cyclic loading may indicate the clinical suitability of all techniques tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for cyclic loading, the number of cycles and the force exceeded 1 200 000 cycles with a 49-N or 98-N force, as are commonly applied. [28][29][30] Even though relatively higher loads were applied in the present study, the fact that no failures occurred during cyclic loading may indicate the clinical suitability of all techniques tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The specimen and test design were based on previous studies. [27][28][29][30] After thermomechanical aging, the specimens were evaluated under ×10 magnification by the same operator (D.G.) to check for any micromovement or fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, restorative materials with lower modulus of elasticity have greater ability to absorb occlusal forces and therefore transmit lower forces and stress to the bone [ 32 ]. Elsayed et al suggested to use a solid abutment, e.g., zirconia abutment with a composite resin crown restoration [ 33 ]. They found that this combination showed the most favorable and the best tested situation withstanding normal occlusal forces [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsayed et al suggested to use a solid abutment, e.g., zirconia abutment with a composite resin crown restoration [ 33 ]. They found that this combination showed the most favorable and the best tested situation withstanding normal occlusal forces [ 33 ]. Composite resin restorations bonded to zirconia abutments were found to possess damping behavior similar to normal teeth [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 All-ceramic abutments and crowns enhanced the esthetic outcome considerably and showed promising mechanical properties in several studies. [7][8][9][10][11] Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture technology (CAD/CAM) has facilitated the manufacturing of all-ceramic restorations, speeding up the process in addition to simplifying it. 12 In addition, CAD/CAM technology enabled the production of one-piece screw-retained implant-supported crowns, 8 eliminating problems related to cementation and visible margins of the crowns, which contributes to better esthetics, retrievability and is helpful in cases with limited interocclusal space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%