2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior of Kevlar/basalt reinforced polypropylene composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These composites were studied both experimentally and numerically to check improvement in properties due to hybridization. A good agreement was found between the experimental and numerical study [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These composites were studied both experimentally and numerically to check improvement in properties due to hybridization. A good agreement was found between the experimental and numerical study [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These issues pave the way for the use of advanced machining techniques for machining of these materials. In recent years, the main focus for the machining of FRP composites has been laid on Abrasive water jet machining (AWJM) and Laser beam machining (LBM) process [4,5]. Shukla and Tambe [6] successfully performed AWJ cutting of Kevlar fiber reinforced polymer composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural jute bers based composites are seen extensively in many automobiles parts, furniture equipment, storage of agricultural products, sports goods, and many chemical products [11]. There are plethora of experimental [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and a few numerical techniques [19][20][21] for the mechanical characterization of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composite (NFRPC) materials or only Natural Fiber Composites (NFC). These numerical techniques can successfully predict the mechanical properties of NFC and different synthetic bers reinforced composite within an acceptable error range [19 − 20] , [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%