2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior of 3D printed syntactic foam composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8(c) shows the superior load–deflection performance of the representative FGSF compared with the respective FG core. Compared to neat (plain) HDPE, P cr of FGSF-1, FGSF-2 and FGSF-3 evaluated through DTM and MBC methods are 1.5, 1.99, 1.66 and 1.53, 2.06, 1.7 times of HDPE, respectively (Bharath et al , 2020b). The experimental P cr values of FGSF-1, FGSF-2 and FGSF-3 predicted using the DTM and MBC methods were 1.05, 1.09, 1.106, and 1.05, 1.10, 1.11 times for FGF-1, FGF-2 and FGF-3, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 8(c) shows the superior load–deflection performance of the representative FGSF compared with the respective FG core. Compared to neat (plain) HDPE, P cr of FGSF-1, FGSF-2 and FGSF-3 evaluated through DTM and MBC methods are 1.5, 1.99, 1.66 and 1.53, 2.06, 1.7 times of HDPE, respectively (Bharath et al , 2020b). The experimental P cr values of FGSF-1, FGSF-2 and FGSF-3 predicted using the DTM and MBC methods were 1.05, 1.09, 1.106, and 1.05, 1.10, 1.11 times for FGF-1, FGF-2 and FGF-3, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density (H: 950 kg/m 3 , H20: 880 kg/m 3 , H20: 810 kg/m 3 and H20: 740 kg/m 3 ) and Poisson’s ratio (H: 0.425, H20: 0.382, H40: 0.339 and H60: 0.296) were used in the Bradelle–Genna model (BGM) to estimate the Young’s modulus of the SFs (Bardella and Francesco, 2001). A numerical analysis was performed by selecting the material properties according to layer thickness (Bharath et al , 2020b). The analysis was initiated with a linear eigenvalue buckling problem through which first buckling mode shapes were obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printing of polymer composites addresses these issues by combining the polymer matrix and nanomaterial reinforcements to generate a society with more valuable structural and functional features than either of the constituents could achieve on their own (Thomas et al, 2019).These reinforcements are usually denser and can be incorporated directly into the polymer matrix to form porous structures (Patil et al, 2019;Bharath et al, 2020;Bonthu et al, 2020).The development of polymer matrix composites, which have great mechanical performance and outstanding functionality, is made feasible by adding reinforcements to polymers in the form of fibers, particles or nanomaterials (Wang et al, 2017). Porosity and fiber orientation of composites have a considerable impact on the properties of final composite products (Patil et al, 2019).…”
Section: Composite Printing Foammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viscoelastic behavior of the core material has a major impact on the final damping performances of the structure. 2,3 Starting from this premise, new material concepts have been considered by customizing their components, as syntactic foam composites with addition of nanoparticles, [4][5][6][7] by using 3D printing technique for the structure realization, 8,9 or considering multilayered frequency-dependent material for damping improvements. 3,10 An interesting example is the study conducted by Shahdin et al, 11 where the damping performance obtained with a Nomex-aramid honeycomb was compared with that obtained by using foam (Rohacell 51A) as core material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%