2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior and abrasive mechanism mapping applied to micro-scratch tests on homogeneous and heterogeneous materials: FEM and experimental analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the model is assumed homogeneous with bulk material properties. Hence, the effect of material heterogeneity which has been shown [48,49] to cause divergence between numerical and experimental results for low loads is not considered.…”
Section: Effects Of Individual Constitutive Materials Parameters On S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the model is assumed homogeneous with bulk material properties. Hence, the effect of material heterogeneity which has been shown [48,49] to cause divergence between numerical and experimental results for low loads is not considered.…”
Section: Effects Of Individual Constitutive Materials Parameters On S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in their research F n and F t were unknown [58]. In the same way, Seriacopi et al performed an FE simulation of a scratch test, and the comparison with the experimental data showed deviations of the F t /F n ratio and scratch depths up to 39.2% and 9.5%, respectively [59].…”
Section: Scratch Test: Experimental and Fe Simulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A detailed examination of Figures 7 and 8 indicated that mixed damage modes occurred, related to the brittleness and roughness of the modified surface and ductility and porosity of the sintered substrate. These features may influence the stylus contact area during the scratch tests of the material and, hence, the type of surface damage [81,82]. For the scratch test at 100 mN, almost no cracks were observed, while for the higher applied loads, cracks propagated in a perpendicular direction to the scratching movement.…”
Section: Scratch Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%