2022
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2021-096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical, antibacterial, biocompatible and microleakage evaluation of glass ionomer cement modified by nanohydroxyapatite/polyhexamethylene biguanide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, modified samples performed well improvements, and the cytotoxicity of modified GIC did not differ statistically from pure GIC. 23 In our study cell proliferation was observed as well, but no cytotoxic effect was observed.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In this study, modified samples performed well improvements, and the cytotoxicity of modified GIC did not differ statistically from pure GIC. 23 In our study cell proliferation was observed as well, but no cytotoxic effect was observed.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The addition of commercially available nanohydroxyapatite (HAP) into a restorative material at different concentrations (0–10%) led to the identification of an optimum concentration of 6% HAP, at which the requirements of the ISO 9917-1 standard [ 9 ] regarding the setting time are fulfilled, and, at the same time, the physico-mechanical properties (compressive strength, microhardness, and microleakage) are improved [ 82 ]. A marginal increase in cell viability was also observed by Golkar et al [ 83 ] when using GIC containing 10% HAP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the authors have shown the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement with the addition of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8% PHMB vs. S. Mutans [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%