2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical and biological treatment of long bone non-unions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study 10 patients of infected nonunion of humerus who were treated with hardware removal, debridement and stabilization in compression with external fixator there was evidence of good bony union in 5 months (range 4 to 6 months), which is comparable to study conducted by Gualdrini et al where the reported union time was 5.5 months after infected nonunion of humerus and 4 months in study done by Biasibetti et al 19,21 Since the nonunion was in the diaphyseal region in all the cases, and because of the co-operative mobilization exercises carried out by the patients there was not much …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study 10 patients of infected nonunion of humerus who were treated with hardware removal, debridement and stabilization in compression with external fixator there was evidence of good bony union in 5 months (range 4 to 6 months), which is comparable to study conducted by Gualdrini et al where the reported union time was 5.5 months after infected nonunion of humerus and 4 months in study done by Biasibetti et al 19,21 Since the nonunion was in the diaphyseal region in all the cases, and because of the co-operative mobilization exercises carried out by the patients there was not much …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…18,19 Functional outcomes were in accordance with bony union we assume it was due to site of non-union's which was in the diaphyseal region in all the cases, and because of the co-operative mobilization exercises carried out by the patients, there was not much of impairment of range of movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…When envisioning the use of GDFs for treating tendon defects, the use of recombinant proteins seems most relevant. Judging by the successful use of BMP-2 and BMP-7 in orthopedics for bone regeneration (53)(54)(55), it might be possible that recombinant GDFs could be approved for clinical use in the treatment of ruptured tendons with relative ease. It is important to note, though, that the use of megadoses of expensive recombinant proteins might limit this potential use.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of present study is compatible with the study by Gualdrini et al, where the average union time was 5.5 months and in study by Biasibetti. A et al, the union time was 4 months [10,11] . In the present study, among the total cases, superficial pin tract infections was noticed in 48% cases and are responded to oral antibiotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%