1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01928175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical agitation of very dilute antiserum against IgE has no effect on basophil staining properties

Abstract: A previously reported effect of mechanically agitated dilutions of antiserum raised against IgE was investigated using the loss of metachromatic staining properties of human basophil leukocytes as a model. A series of 24 blind experiments was performed in which we determined the number of toluidine blue-stainable basophils after incubating with vortexed or non-vortexed dilutions of anti-IgE. Tenfold serial dilutions were used, in the range 10(21) to 10(30) (6.6 x 10(-26) to 6.6 x 10(-35) M anti-IgE). We found … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that other studies of equal quality have not been able to reproduce these findings. [28][29][30] Another example is a series of studies that found that the administration of an oral dose of a homeopathic preparation of arsenic trioxide protected mice from the detrimental changes in proteins, enzymes, DNA, and RNA caused by one injection of arsenic trioxide of 1mg/kg bodyweight, corroborating the 1997 findings of Weigant et al [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Overall, the results from studies assessing the ability of very dilute solutions to have biological effects are mixed. Although, high quality research shows that homeopathic preparations do have measurable effects on biological systems; to date, studies have not successfully settled the original dilemma concerning a mechanism of action for very dilute solutions.…”
Section: Physical Experiments In Dilution Researchsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it should be noted that other studies of equal quality have not been able to reproduce these findings. [28][29][30] Another example is a series of studies that found that the administration of an oral dose of a homeopathic preparation of arsenic trioxide protected mice from the detrimental changes in proteins, enzymes, DNA, and RNA caused by one injection of arsenic trioxide of 1mg/kg bodyweight, corroborating the 1997 findings of Weigant et al [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Overall, the results from studies assessing the ability of very dilute solutions to have biological effects are mixed. Although, high quality research shows that homeopathic preparations do have measurable effects on biological systems; to date, studies have not successfully settled the original dilemma concerning a mechanism of action for very dilute solutions.…”
Section: Physical Experiments In Dilution Researchsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…3,[6][7][8] Pharmacists should also be aware that the data assessing the efficacy of homeopathy are mixed-there are rigorous, reproducible studies that show homeopathy is effective, 39,[42][43][44] and equally scientifically sound studies that show it is not. [28][29][30][80][81][82] A similar situation exists with respect to in vivo studies of homoeopathic products used to treat plants and animals. 83,84 Pharmacists should also be aware that there is currently no plausible mechanism of action postulated for homeopathy; even homeopathic doctors do not claim to know how it works.…”
Section: What Should Pharmacists Know About Homeopathy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davenas et al [2] used this system to demonstrate the effect of extremely high anti-IgE dilutions. Others were at first unable to confirm the described effects [3,4]. In later work these attempts were modified in such a way to permit the examination of basophil reaction to highly diluted histamine with subsequent optimized anti-IgE activation [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of experiments was conducted by Benveniste and his laboratory groups, culminating in a final publication postulating the replicability of the effect across laboratories. 27 This publication was heavily criticized, resulting in independent investigations of the paradigm with no clear-cut reproducible effect, 28,29 although other experiments, again, yielded positive results. 30,31 Apparently, even before that, some of the participating laboratories had withdrawn because the effect was not consistent across laboratories.…”
Section: Walach Et Al 814mentioning
confidence: 99%