1953
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0320968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat Yield of Broilers of Different Breeds, Strains and Crosses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1955
1955
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The commercial broiler birds are crosses between Plymouth Rocks, Cornish Indian game bird, Langshans, Brahma and New Hampshire (Hathaway et al . ; Crawford ). Early attempts to produce hybrid chickens for meat were in the 1930s, and the intensification of the broiler industry started in the late 1950s (Gyles ; Griffin & Goddard ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercial broiler birds are crosses between Plymouth Rocks, Cornish Indian game bird, Langshans, Brahma and New Hampshire (Hathaway et al . ; Crawford ). Early attempts to produce hybrid chickens for meat were in the 1930s, and the intensification of the broiler industry started in the late 1950s (Gyles ; Griffin & Goddard ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that loss due to dressing and evisceration was related to body size and the purebreds and crossbreds showing higher body weights tend to show a higher percentage of loss due to dressing and evisceration. But Hathaway (1953) found no significant difference between the strains used with respect to losses from live to New York dressed weights, though he did find a difference between strains based on eviscerated weights. But Hathaway (1953) found no significant difference between the strains used with respect to losses from live to New York dressed weights, though he did find a difference between strains based on eviscerated weights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Because the hybrid birds reached 33 lb live weight several weeks earlier than the RIR x LS birds, and therefore had a shorter period of maintenance, it is not surprising that their overall efficiency in converting dietary ME into both body energy (Davidson & Mathieson, 1965) and cooked edible energy (Table I) was greater in each experiment than that of the RIR x LS birds. The considerably greater efficiency of the hybrids in Expt z was perhaps connected with the times of year at which these experi- (Hathaway, Champagne, Watts & Upp, 1953;Stotts & Darrow, 1953) have shown breed differences in the yield of raw edible meat per unit of eviscerated or ready-to-cook weight, other studies (Morrison, Sauter, McLaren & Stadelman, 1954;Kondra, Richards & Hodgson, 1962) have not. I n the work now presented a systematic difference in the amounts of cooked edible material obtained from fast-and slower-growing breeds was not found.…”
Section: I965mentioning
confidence: 95%