“…However, such a clear correlation was not observed in this study. An analysis of pork color based on the values of CIELAB coordinates revealed that the experimental factor had no had no influence on color parameters (L*a*b*), which corroborates the findings of Hanczakowska and Świątkiewicz (2014), Moore et al (2016), Sońta et al (2017), andZmudzińska et al (2020). Some studies have shown that not only the type of high-protein feed of plant origin, but also their share in compound feed for porkers, may affect the color of the meat.…”
Section: Meat Quality Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The inclusion of various plant-based protein sources in pig diets had no significant effect on the chemical composition of the LD muscle, which corroborates the findings of other authors. The chemical composition of pork was not significantly affected by the dietary inclusion of corn DDGS (Lee et al 2011(Lee et al , Świątkiewicz et al 2013, SBM (Jansons et al 2020), 00-RSM (Zmudzińska et al 2020), FB seeds (Milczarek and Osek 2016) and YL seeds (Sońta et al 2017).…”
Section: Meat Quality Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the observed differences, the water-holding capacity of pork was satisfactory in all groups. Świątkiewicz (2014), andSońta et al (2017) demonstrated that YL seeds fed to fattening pigs had no significant effect on the water-holding capacity of their meat. Similar observations were made by Milczarek and Osek (2016) who analyzed the efficacy of FB seeds in pigs.…”
The objective of this study was to evaluate carcass and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs fed diets with different vegetable protein sources. It was found that partial (50% in grower diets) and complete (100% in finisher diets) replacement of protein from genetically modified soybean meal (GM-SBM) with protein from 00-rapeseed meal (00-RSM), alone or in combination with protein from faba bean seeds (FB) cv. ‘Albus’, yellow lupine seeds (YL) cv. ‘Taper’ or corn DDGS, had no significant effect on carcass quality characteristics or the chemical composition of meat. In all groups, meat samples were characterized by color typical of pork, high water-holding capacity and low pH values. A sensory analysis of the eating quality attributes of meat revealed that they were highly satisfactory; only aroma intensity was affected by the experimental factor. The study demonstrated that growing-finishing pigs can be fed complete diets containing the analyzed vegetable protein sources alternative to GM-SBM without compromising carcass or meat quality.
“…However, such a clear correlation was not observed in this study. An analysis of pork color based on the values of CIELAB coordinates revealed that the experimental factor had no had no influence on color parameters (L*a*b*), which corroborates the findings of Hanczakowska and Świątkiewicz (2014), Moore et al (2016), Sońta et al (2017), andZmudzińska et al (2020). Some studies have shown that not only the type of high-protein feed of plant origin, but also their share in compound feed for porkers, may affect the color of the meat.…”
Section: Meat Quality Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The inclusion of various plant-based protein sources in pig diets had no significant effect on the chemical composition of the LD muscle, which corroborates the findings of other authors. The chemical composition of pork was not significantly affected by the dietary inclusion of corn DDGS (Lee et al 2011(Lee et al , Świątkiewicz et al 2013, SBM (Jansons et al 2020), 00-RSM (Zmudzińska et al 2020), FB seeds (Milczarek and Osek 2016) and YL seeds (Sońta et al 2017).…”
Section: Meat Quality Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the observed differences, the water-holding capacity of pork was satisfactory in all groups. Świątkiewicz (2014), andSońta et al (2017) demonstrated that YL seeds fed to fattening pigs had no significant effect on the water-holding capacity of their meat. Similar observations were made by Milczarek and Osek (2016) who analyzed the efficacy of FB seeds in pigs.…”
The objective of this study was to evaluate carcass and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs fed diets with different vegetable protein sources. It was found that partial (50% in grower diets) and complete (100% in finisher diets) replacement of protein from genetically modified soybean meal (GM-SBM) with protein from 00-rapeseed meal (00-RSM), alone or in combination with protein from faba bean seeds (FB) cv. ‘Albus’, yellow lupine seeds (YL) cv. ‘Taper’ or corn DDGS, had no significant effect on carcass quality characteristics or the chemical composition of meat. In all groups, meat samples were characterized by color typical of pork, high water-holding capacity and low pH values. A sensory analysis of the eating quality attributes of meat revealed that they were highly satisfactory; only aroma intensity was affected by the experimental factor. The study demonstrated that growing-finishing pigs can be fed complete diets containing the analyzed vegetable protein sources alternative to GM-SBM without compromising carcass or meat quality.
“…Meat quality has been studied in pigs that were offered complete feeds with a share of legume seeds and rapeseed meal [RSM]. Most often, the authors applied a partial replacement of SBM with yellow lupin, narrow-leaved lupin, pea, or RSM in experimental diets [ 16 , 17 ], whereas the control diets contained SBM. In those studies, the feed components did not negatively affect pork meat quality and the evaluated parameters did not differ from the meat of fattening pigs that were fed with SBM.…”
The aim of this work was to assess the impact of a total dietary replacement of extracted soybean meal (SBM) on body weight gain and pork quality. DanBred hybrid piglets were divided into four groups of 10 piglets each. Groups I (males) and II (females) were the control groups and fed a standardized SBM-based complete feed. The experimental groups III (males) and IV (females) were offered a diet in which the SBM was replaced with extracted rapeseed meal (RSM) and legume plants (pea and yellow lupin). After 83 days of fattening, the animals were slaughtered. Based on the collected data, the daily weight gain (DWG), feed intake (FI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. In addition, longissimus dorsi muscle was subjected to physicochemical analyses, including the basic chemical composition. All the analyses were performed in accordance with the applicable methodologies. As a result of this experiment, no interactions were found between the experimental factors (sex and diet). The replacement of SMB by legumes and RSM resulted in a significant reduction in the final body weight of growing–finishing pigs. Additionally, daily body weight gain was reduced between 35–83 days, and through the whole fattening period (0–83 days). Most pork meat quality parameters were not affected by the type of mix feed and sex (p > 0.05). The fattening pigs that were fed legume seeds and RSM had significantly reduced fatness (p > 0.05) compared to the control pigs. In males, there was also a significantly lower pH45 (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that feeding pigs with diets containing legume plants and extracted rapeseed meal does not affect the pork meat quality, but it may worsen the body weight gain.
“…(2020) did not find an impact of a lupin-rich diet on the collagen content of ducks' breast muscles. Even in the meat of fattening pigs fed a yellow lupin–based diet, no effect on the collagen content was noticed ( Sońta et al., 2017 ). Starkey et al.…”
Goose meat is characterized by good quality and a good fatty acid composition. Geese do not need many compounds in their feed to ensure suitable growth. The main source of protein in most feed is soybean meal (
SBM
). New cultivars of yellow lupin with fewer antinutrients could be a substitute for soybean. The study's aim was to compare the quality of the carcass and meat, as well as the fatty acid composition and the collagen and cholesterol content in the breast muscles from geese fed a diet based on yellow lupin as an replacement for soybean meal. In the study, geese were divided into 2 study groups. The first was a control group (Group 1), fed a feed based on SBM; the second one was an experimental group (Group 2), fed a feed based on yellow lupin “Mister”, potato protein, and brewer's yeast. The rearing period was divided into 3 stages, and the last stage was oat fattening. Each group (105 birds in each group) was divided into 5 replications with 21 birds. After 16 wk of rearing, 10 geese from each group were slaughtered. The carcasses were analyzed for physicochemical traits (dissection, color, water-holding capacity, and chemical composition of the breast and leg muscles, as well as pH level, drip loss, and fatty acid profile of the breast muscles). The drip loss from the breast muscles was higher (
P
< 0.05) and the water-holding capacity of the leg muscles lower (
P
< 0.05) in Group 1 than in Group 2. Group 1 also displayed a higher content of protein and water in breast and leg muscles (
P
< 0.05) but lower fat content than that of Group 2 (
P
< 0.05). The linoleic acid content of the breast muscles was higher in Group 2 (
P
< 0.05), whereas the other fatty acid levels were comparable between the groups. The total content of polyunsaturated fatty acid (
PUFA
) (n-6 and n-3) and the PUFA/ saturated fatty acid ratio was higher in Group 2 (
P
< 0.05). Moreover, the thrombogenic index was lower (
P
< 0.05) in the geese fed a lupin-diet. Overall, the yellow lupin–based feed had beneficial effects on the goose meat's traits, and it can be used as a high-protein compound in diets for geese. It is also possible to produce traditional geese fattened by oats.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.