2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00134-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
105
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
14
105
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher index calculated for the outdoor group confirmed the data obtained by Falaschini et al (2000) for heavy pigs bred in a similar way, indicating that a part of the energy supplied by the ration is spent on motor activity. However, our FCR was similar in absolute terms to those reported by Suzuki et al (2003) for Duroc and Berkshire subjects weighing 70 to 105 kg.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher index calculated for the outdoor group confirmed the data obtained by Falaschini et al (2000) for heavy pigs bred in a similar way, indicating that a part of the energy supplied by the ration is spent on motor activity. However, our FCR was similar in absolute terms to those reported by Suzuki et al (2003) for Duroc and Berkshire subjects weighing 70 to 105 kg.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Trimmed ham weight was not significantly affected by either variable, while the meat of indoorbred subjects was significantly lighter (L*) (P<0.01). The L* value obtained by the two diets was lower than that reported by Suzuki et al (2003) for different genetic types and by Bonomi (2005) for pigs fed with peas, while that of the indoor-bred group was similar to the one described by Franci et al (2005) for Cinta Senese pigs; L* in outdoor-bred subjects was lower than that reported by Gentry et al (2004) and by Pugliese et al (1999) in pigs reared with the same technique.…”
Section: Diet (D)supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, although the content of IMF in Agu pigs was significantly higher than in LWD pigs, the tenderness of Agu meat was not significantly different from that of LWD meat. This result is consistent with a study by SUZUKI et al (2003) indicating that there is no significant difference in the tenderness of the meat measured by a tensipresser, although the IMF of Duroc and LDD (Duroc sires× F1 dams ; Landrace×Duroc) is thicker than that of Berkshire and LDB (Berkshire sires×F1 dams ; Landrace×Duroc). In general, meat tenderness is affected by not only IMF content but also other factors such as the amount and solubility of connective tissue, the composition and contractility of muscle fibers (JOO et al, 2013), the length of proteolysis sarcomere and the content of collagen (WHEELER et al, 2000).…”
Section: Meat Quality Traitssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some researchers have reported that fatty acid composition of meat could be improved by the diet (French et al, 2000;Hsia and Lu, 2004;Nuernberg et al, 2005). Suzuki et al (2003) reported that in general, SFAs of meat are palmitic acid and stearic acid in Berkshire, and USFAs are oleic and linoleic acid. The same results were found in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%