2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat inspection and hygiene in a Meat Factory Cell – An alternative concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gap: Reporting systems from MI are many places manual, poor and unable to detect considerable biases. Alban, Petersen, et al (2021) Alban, Vieira-Pinto et al (2021) Antunović et al (2021) Alvseike et al (2021) Buncic, Alban, and Blagojevic (2019) Alvseike, Prieto, Torkveen, Ruud, and Nesbakken (2018) ( de Freitas Costa, Corbellini, da Silva, & Nauta, 2017 ) Devitt et al (2016) Bækbo, Petersen, Larsen, and Alban (2016) Berthe, Hugas, and Makela (2013) 853/2004 Annex III, Chapter III: Requirements for cutting plants Food business operators must ensure that cutting plants handling meat of domestic ungulates: 1. are constructed so as to avoid contamination of meat, in particular by: (a) allowing constant progress of the operations; or (b) ensuring separation between the different production batches. Conventional methodology conserved by prescriptive hygiene legislation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap: Reporting systems from MI are many places manual, poor and unable to detect considerable biases. Alban, Petersen, et al (2021) Alban, Vieira-Pinto et al (2021) Antunović et al (2021) Alvseike et al (2021) Buncic, Alban, and Blagojevic (2019) Alvseike, Prieto, Torkveen, Ruud, and Nesbakken (2018) ( de Freitas Costa, Corbellini, da Silva, & Nauta, 2017 ) Devitt et al (2016) Bækbo, Petersen, Larsen, and Alban (2016) Berthe, Hugas, and Makela (2013) 853/2004 Annex III, Chapter III: Requirements for cutting plants Food business operators must ensure that cutting plants handling meat of domestic ungulates: 1. are constructed so as to avoid contamination of meat, in particular by: (a) allowing constant progress of the operations; or (b) ensuring separation between the different production batches. Conventional methodology conserved by prescriptive hygiene legislation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the belly-cut. Also, from a meat inspection point of view, detection of lesions and abnormalities should at least be as sensitive as in traditional procedures [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Meat Factory Cell (MFC) approach for pig slaughter and primary cutting has recently been suggested and described [ 1 , 2 ]. MFC applies three principal changes to conventional meat production and processing: Work partly organised in cell stations instead of lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, it has been postulated that the use of hyperspectral imaging techniques in meat safety could be combined with other technologies for maximum effect, e.g., machine vision to track and inspect broilers in an automated fashion during the breeding process [13]. In the meat factory cell automation concept, work is organized in cell stations instead of lines, some elements of slaughter and cutting are merged, and the carcass is disassembled from the outside [14]. This would allow for easier application of novel diagnostic tools such as electromagnetic and imaging tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%