2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.04.20085225
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study

Abstract: Background: There is limited prospective evidence on the association between meat consumption and many common, non-cancerous health outcomes. We examined associations of meat intake with risk of 25 common conditions (other than cancer). Methods: We used data from 474 998 middle-aged men and women recruited into the UK Biobank study between 2006 and 2010 and followed-up until 2017 (mean follow-up of 8.0 years) with available information on meat intake at baseline (collected via touchscreen questionnaire), and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcomes of interest were the 25 most common, well-defined primary causes of non-cancer related hospital admission in this cohort based on the primary International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 diagnosis codes recorded during admission. 29 We excluded some common reasons for hospital admission in this cohort (e.g. nausea or heartburn) because they were not well-defined and/or were likely to be associated with a diverse range of underlying conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes of interest were the 25 most common, well-defined primary causes of non-cancer related hospital admission in this cohort based on the primary International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 diagnosis codes recorded during admission. 29 We excluded some common reasons for hospital admission in this cohort (e.g. nausea or heartburn) because they were not well-defined and/or were likely to be associated with a diverse range of underlying conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search of previous systematic reviews yielded two additional full texts. The search was updated on May 20, 2020 yielding one additional study, and on June 4, 2021 yielding 5 additional studies of which one was an updated analysis of a study from the original search including more cases (Al-Shaar et al 2020;Ascherio et al 1994) and one was a full text peer reviewed publication of a preprint included in the first updated search (Table S1, supplementary material) (Papier et al 2020(Papier et al , 2021.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a British study of some 475,000 people found that eating meat three or more times per week is linked with increased diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. ( Papier et al, 2020 ) A synthesis of two U.S.-based prospective cohort studies with more than 80,000 subjects and 1.2 million years of follow-up found that an increase of only half a serving of red meat each day was associated with a 10% increase in all-cause mortality. ( Zheng et al, 2019 ) One meta-analysis of 12 prospective studies including 177,655 deaths found that each additional 100 g of red meat consumed daily was associated with a 10% increase in all-cause mortality in a “linear dose–response” manner.…”
Section: Health Benefits Of Sustainable Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%