2018
DOI: 10.3390/nu10040390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat Consumption and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: Results from the Korean Population and a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract: Many studies have reported harmful effects of red meat or processed meat on chronic diseases including cancer and diabetes, but epidemiological evidence for metabolic syndrome is limited and remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to assess the association between various meat consumption and risk of metabolic syndrome. The PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases were searched through June 2017, and further included unpublished results from Korea National Health … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, there is a positive association between daily energy intake and skeletal muscle mass, and dietary intake is related to MetS in that the Western diet is associated with the development of MetS. Although traditional Korean meals contain high proportions of vegetables and carbohydrates with low proportions of fat, previous findings of the association between diet and MetS in this population have been inconclusive . Similar to the present results, Woo et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, there is a positive association between daily energy intake and skeletal muscle mass, and dietary intake is related to MetS in that the Western diet is associated with the development of MetS. Although traditional Korean meals contain high proportions of vegetables and carbohydrates with low proportions of fat, previous findings of the association between diet and MetS in this population have been inconclusive . Similar to the present results, Woo et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…found a positive association between meat consumption and MetS but only in men; the sex difference may be related to the relatively low red meat consumption in women compared with men. Likewise, Kim et al . suggested that the relatively low consumption of red meat by Asians compared with Caucasians can explain these inconsistent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also agree previous findings in which total, red, and processed meat consumption is positively associated with MetS [27], which could potentially increase the risk of chronic diseases, including T2DM, CVD, and several types of cancer [47]. Conversely, our lowest severity MetSSS participants tended to have a higher intake of white meat, like previous findings that showed an inverse association between white meat intake and MetS [28].…”
Section: Dietary Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Concretely, T3 participants showed lower carbohydrate and nut intake and moderate and vigorous LTPA, which is associated with higher risk of CVD [4,5,25]. Conversely, T3 showed higher intake of protein, SFA, TFA, cholesterol, as well as higher consumption of red and processed meat, and other oils different from olive oil and spirits compared with T1, resulting in an increased risk of several major chronic diseases [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive consumption of meat and animal products may be deleterious to human health (with meta-analytic evidence regarding cancer [1][2][3][4], cardiovascular disease [5][6][7], metabolic disease [8][9][10], obesity [11], stroke [12], and all-cause mortality [13], albeit sometimes subject to methodological limitations), promotes the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens [14], is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation [15], and contributes to market demand for industry practices that cause the preventable suffering of more than one billion animals in the USA annually [16]. Therefore, developing simple, effective interventions to reduce meat consumption could carry widespread societal benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%