2012
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat consumption and risk of lung cancer: evidence from observational studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
48
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no association with total fish intake, which is consistent with a recent meta-analysis that reported no association between fish intake and lung cancer risk [34]. Since many hypotheses were tested in our analysis, this finding may be due to chance and needs to be confirmed in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, there was no association with total fish intake, which is consistent with a recent meta-analysis that reported no association between fish intake and lung cancer risk [34]. Since many hypotheses were tested in our analysis, this finding may be due to chance and needs to be confirmed in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some of previous studies have also reported this a causative variable (Alavanja et al, 2001;Lam et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2012;Gnagnarella et al, 2013), but OR values was much lower as compared to present study. Per capita Red meat consumption in Pakistan is higher than its neighboring countries like India and Afghanistan.…”
Section: Causative Factorscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Red meat consumption was not associated with lung cancer risk, while vegetable consumption was found to be protective against lung cancer in a cohort study conducted in Europe [23, 24]. In contrast, results from a recent meta-analysis suggest an increased risk of lung cancer with high intake of red meat [25, 26], whereas white meat consumption showed an inverse association with lung cancer among non-smokers in a large case-control study conducted in Singapore [27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%