2019
DOI: 10.1071/an17888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat and carcass quality of Dexter cattle compared with that of suckler, Charolais-cross calves: a preliminary study

Abstract: Tenderness, flavour and colour are the most important quality traits of beef that are influenced by breed and age. Suckler calves (SC) produce very tender, high-quality meat. Extensively growing, small-framed breeds are known for high-quality beef, but information about the particularly small Dexter cattle (D) is yet unavailable. Eight D and seven Charolais-crossbreed SC were kept for 11 weeks on alpine pastures to be able to compare their meat quality. The SC were kept with their dams. The animals of the two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cattle and sheep meat did not differ with respect to pH at 24 h post mortem in either muscle. Similar high cooking losses in two animal species have been reported for robust Valdostana cattle (Kreuzer et al 2021), Dexter cattle and Charolais suckling calves (Giller et al 2019) However, in other studies carried out with different breeds under varying conditions, lower cooking losses were noted in the two muscles (Chambaz et al 2003;Gangnat et al 2016;Giller et al 2021). Despite the generally higher shear force compared to the Engadine sheep meat in our study, the BF of the Dexter cattle qualified as tender (≤40 N; Branscheid et al 2007).…”
Section: Muscle Fibre Type Characteristics and Physicochemical Meat Q...supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The cattle and sheep meat did not differ with respect to pH at 24 h post mortem in either muscle. Similar high cooking losses in two animal species have been reported for robust Valdostana cattle (Kreuzer et al 2021), Dexter cattle and Charolais suckling calves (Giller et al 2019) However, in other studies carried out with different breeds under varying conditions, lower cooking losses were noted in the two muscles (Chambaz et al 2003;Gangnat et al 2016;Giller et al 2021). Despite the generally higher shear force compared to the Engadine sheep meat in our study, the BF of the Dexter cattle qualified as tender (≤40 N; Branscheid et al 2007).…”
Section: Muscle Fibre Type Characteristics and Physicochemical Meat Q...supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the generally higher shear force compared to the Engadine sheep meat in our study, the BF of the Dexter cattle qualified as tender (≤40 N; Branscheid et al 2007). However, the LT of Dexter beef aged for 3 weeks had a surprisingly large shear force not previously found in this breed (Giller et al 2019). The differences in the muscle fibre profiles between the two animal species may help interpret the differences in the water-holding capacity and tenderness.…”
Section: Muscle Fibre Type Characteristics and Physicochemical Meat Q...mentioning
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study revealed a significantly higher content of intramuscular fat in geese fed yellow lupin. This is not a negative trait, because other researchers ( Damaziak et al., 2019 ; Giller et al., 2019 ) reported that fat is a carrier of flavors in meat. The water binding of meat is expressed as water-holding capacity and amount of drip loss (the values indicate how much water was lost).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%