2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Youth Health Engagement: Development of the Youth Engagement With Health Services Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perceived quality of care was measured using a modified, four-item measure from the Experience of Care Subscale in the Youth Engagement with Health Services (YEHS!) survey [26]. Items were modified to focus explicitly on the oncology setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perceived quality of care was measured using a modified, four-item measure from the Experience of Care Subscale in the Youth Engagement with Health Services (YEHS!) survey [26]. Items were modified to focus explicitly on the oncology setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified version of the Health Self-Efficacy subscale of the Youth Engagement with Health Services (YEHS!) survey was used to evaluate patient engagement [26]. The survey was originally developed for use with healthy adolescents, so items were modified or removed to focus explicitly on care received in the oncology setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health engagement was also assessed through the youth engagement with health services (YEHS) survey [22]. Responses were summed across 2 YEHS subscales for health access literacy (5 items; Cronbach α=.81) and health self-efficacy (5 items; Cronbach α=.89).…”
Section: Health Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AC designers and assessors are required to hold expertise relevant to their positions. The views of subject matter experts (SMEs) are widely used as a source of research evidence in applied psychology (Dries, Pepermans, & Carlier, 2008;Flores, Zheng, Rau, & Thomas, 2012;Francis-Smythe, Haase, Thomas, & Steele, 2013;Jones & Born, 2008;Motowidlo & Beier, 2010;Sebastian, Ramos, Stumbo, McGrath, & Fairbrother, 2014;Woehrmann, Deller, & Wang, 2014). Although AC assessees are not organizational SMEs in the usual sense of the term, they have relevant experience of ACs from a distinctive perspective, and their perceptions may impact in several ways on organizations using ACs, including the likelihood that they will accept a job offer and their first impression of the organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%