1995
DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(94)00005-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring yield risk effects of new technologies with on-farm trials: A case study in north Cameroon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pinstrup-Andersen, 1979;Bowman et al, 1989;Bonnieux et al, 1993;Gotsch et al, 1993;Griffith et al, 1995;Borch and Rasmussen, 2005;Lankoski et al, 2006;Self and Grabowski, 2007;Jensen et al, 2012;Nolan and Santos, 2012); (ii) the effect of using new technologies on agricultural outputs at farm level in developing countries (e.g. Mann et al, 1968;Loehman et al, 1995;Hijmans et al, 2003;Jagtap and Abamu, 2003;Sheikh et al, 2003;Torkamani, 2005;White et al, 2005); (iii) consumers' acceptance of, for example, GMOs and biotechnology (e.g. Bonnieux et al, 1993;Burton et al, 2001;Lusk et al, 2004;Vergragt and Brown, 2008); and (iv) most recently, the impact of innovative agricultural technologies (e.g.…”
Section: Participatory Technology Assessment In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pinstrup-Andersen, 1979;Bowman et al, 1989;Bonnieux et al, 1993;Gotsch et al, 1993;Griffith et al, 1995;Borch and Rasmussen, 2005;Lankoski et al, 2006;Self and Grabowski, 2007;Jensen et al, 2012;Nolan and Santos, 2012); (ii) the effect of using new technologies on agricultural outputs at farm level in developing countries (e.g. Mann et al, 1968;Loehman et al, 1995;Hijmans et al, 2003;Jagtap and Abamu, 2003;Sheikh et al, 2003;Torkamani, 2005;White et al, 2005); (iii) consumers' acceptance of, for example, GMOs and biotechnology (e.g. Bonnieux et al, 1993;Burton et al, 2001;Lusk et al, 2004;Vergragt and Brown, 2008); and (iv) most recently, the impact of innovative agricultural technologies (e.g.…”
Section: Participatory Technology Assessment In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 98%