2020
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2019.1683757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Women’s Agency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In households where women experienced unequal access to resources and decision-making processes the effects of climate change were more adverse as compared to those with gender good relations. It was thus envisaged that poor gender relations were going to constrain the women's ability to cope up with climate change (Donald et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In households where women experienced unequal access to resources and decision-making processes the effects of climate change were more adverse as compared to those with gender good relations. It was thus envisaged that poor gender relations were going to constrain the women's ability to cope up with climate change (Donald et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we define SRH empowerment as the progression from the existence of choice through the exercise of choice to the achievement of choice (Malhotra, Ruth Schuler, and Boender 2002;Kabeer 1999). In addition, we draw on Donald et al's work on agency to specify the existence of choice as a woman's internal and external motivations for setting her sexual and reproductive goals (motivational autonomy) (Donald et al 2016). We also use Donald et al's work to specify exercise of choice as encompassing a variety of skills, particularly a woman's level of confidence in acting on her choices (self-efficacy), her negotiation abilities with her partner (negotiation) and her capacity to make decisions (decisionmaking) (Bandura 1977(Bandura , 1990Longmore et al 2003;Donald et al 2016).…”
Section: The Development Of the Women's And Girls' Empowerment In Sexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we draw on Donald et al's work on agency to specify the existence of choice as a woman's internal and external motivations for setting her sexual and reproductive goals (motivational autonomy) (Donald et al 2016). We also use Donald et al's work to specify exercise of choice as encompassing a variety of skills, particularly a woman's level of confidence in acting on her choices (self-efficacy), her negotiation abilities with her partner (negotiation) and her capacity to make decisions (decisionmaking) (Bandura 1977(Bandura , 1990Longmore et al 2003;Donald et al 2016). This process leads to achievement of choice, defined in our SRH framework as sex by choice, contraception by choice and pregnancy by choice.…”
Section: The Development Of the Women's And Girls' Empowerment In Sexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies from different countries, however, are increasingly showing that household members often do not act collectively in these decisions. Substantial spousal disagreement on intra-household decision-making roles have often been highlighted in recent studies from sub-Saharan Africa (Donald et al, 2017), which looked at decisions over large purchases and use of spouse's income, as well as Bangladesh (Ambler et al, 2017), which examined decisionmaking over the use of productive capital and assets. Men and women within the household may also use different coping strategies to respond to shocks, often stemming from gender inequalities in economic opportunities and mobility, as well as time burdens.…”
Section: The Policy Importance Of Examining the Gender Dimensions Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conducting a survey of spouses across 1 851 rural households in Tanzania, Anderson et al (2017) found that spouses often do not agree on who makes decisions across a range of questions regarding household and farming management. Using DHS data for 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Donald et al (2017), for example, found that women reporting greater decision-making power were also more likely to have positive indicators of 'empowerment' (e.g. working off-farm, owning land, having similar education levels to their husbands, reporting higher earnings than their husbands', being part of non-polygamous marriages and speaking against domestic violence).…”
Section: Box 3 Decision-making Questions In the Women's Empowerment mentioning
confidence: 99%