2005
DOI: 10.1093/jae/eji020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Welfare for Small but Vulnerable Groups: Poverty and Disability in Uganda

Abstract: When vulnerable population groups are numerically small -as is often the case -obtaining representative welfare estimates from non-purposive sample surveys becomes an issue. Building on a method developed by Elbers et al., it is shown how, for census years, estimates of consumption poverty for small vulnerable populations can be derived by combining sample survey and population census information. The approach is illustrated for Uganda, for which poverty amongst households with disabled heads is determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
5
73
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence demonstrates employment disparities in a number of low-and middle-income contexts as well (see, e.g., Hoogeveen, 2005 Trani & Loeb, 2010 [Afghanistan, Zambia]). Mizunoya and Mitra (2013) assessed the employment gaps in fifteen low-and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and found statistically significant employment gaps for people with disabilities in nine out of the fifteen examples; interestingly, the six countries that had either no gap or a statistically insignificant gap were low-income nations, while all but two with a significant employment gap were middle-income.…”
Section: Global Situation Of Work and Economic Disparities For Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence demonstrates employment disparities in a number of low-and middle-income contexts as well (see, e.g., Hoogeveen, 2005 Trani & Loeb, 2010 [Afghanistan, Zambia]). Mizunoya and Mitra (2013) assessed the employment gaps in fifteen low-and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and found statistically significant employment gaps for people with disabilities in nine out of the fifteen examples; interestingly, the six countries that had either no gap or a statistically insignificant gap were low-income nations, while all but two with a significant employment gap were middle-income.…”
Section: Global Situation Of Work and Economic Disparities For Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, studies use different methods: some studies only present means and frequency counts of economic indicators across disability status (e.g., Hoogeveen 2005), while other studies resort to multivariate analysis using a variety of empirical strategies which can be difficult to compare. 6 Some studies measure disability through functional difficulties (e.g., , while others use broad activity limitations (e.g., Mitra 2008).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 People with disabilities are over-represented among the world's poor, and many experience multiple deprivations at higher rates and in higher breadth, depth, and severity than people without disabilities (Mitra, Posarac, & Vick, 2013;Samman & Rodriguez-Takeuchi, 2013). The lack of access to paid work and/or wider economic activity is a significant social disadvantage and helps maintain the link between poverty and disability in many country contexts (Braitwaite & Mont, 2009;Haveman & Wolfe, 1990;Hoogeveen, 2005;Peiyun & Livermore, 2008;WHO, 2011;Zaidi & Burchardt, 2005). The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on eliminating poverty, launched by the United Nations in 2000, are unlikely to be achieved unless explicit and specific efforts are undertaken to support disabled people's participation in labour market activities (Department for International Development [DFID], 2000; Groce & Trani, 2009).…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%