2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03737-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Voting Power: The Paradox of New Members vs. the Null Player Axiom

Abstract: Qualified majority voting is used when decisions are made by voters of different sizes. In such situations the voters' influence on decision making is far from obvious; power measures are used for an indication of the decision making ability. Several power measures have been proposed and characterised by simple axioms to help the choice between them. Unfortunately the power measures also feature a number of so-called paradoxes of voting power. In this paper we show that the Paradox of New Members follows from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Property of New Members (Brams and Auso, 1976;Kóczy, 2009) Do they benet? What we have seen here is that the conditional probability that if a decision is made, it is a particular player who made the decision is increased for most players.…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Property of New Members (Brams and Auso, 1976;Kóczy, 2009) Do they benet? What we have seen here is that the conditional probability that if a decision is made, it is a particular player who made the decision is increased for most players.…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example is well known in the voting literature. Its first academic discussion is probably Brams and Affuso [3], but it has appeared in several other studies [11,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the Property of New Members [17,18] in the appropriate restriction of a weighted voting, remaining members should have more power. The departure of the United Kingdom does lead, for most players, to higher Shapley-Shubik index values (Tables A1 and A2).…”
Section: Who Wins?mentioning
confidence: 99%