2000
DOI: 10.1093/llc/15.3.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
149
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
149
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Following common practice in LD assessment (e.g., Hess et al, 1986;McKee, Malvern, & Richards, 2000;Tweedie & Baayen, 1998), each text of each register was divided into ever smaller sections (i.e., one section of 2,000, two sections of 1,000, etc.). This sectioning allowed each text to be represented in 11 different size forms for 99 data points per register; more specifically, the sectioning was necessary to establish the sensitivity of the LD indices when texts of varying lengths were assessed (see the discussion of internal validity, below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following common practice in LD assessment (e.g., Hess et al, 1986;McKee, Malvern, & Richards, 2000;Tweedie & Baayen, 1998), each text of each register was divided into ever smaller sections (i.e., one section of 2,000, two sections of 1,000, etc.). This sectioning allowed each text to be represented in 11 different size forms for 99 data points per register; more specifically, the sectioning was necessary to establish the sensitivity of the LD indices when texts of varying lengths were assessed (see the discussion of internal validity, below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is defined as the number of unique phrases appearing in titles of a statistically large unit quota of literature (thousands of articles). It is similar to the lexical diversity used in computational linguistics to study richness of verbal expression (McKee et al, 2000;McCarthy and Jarvis, 2007;Koizumi, 2012), but uses phrases (concepts) instead of individual words. Bodies of literature that have more diverse concepts in titles will have a higher fraction of unique phrases and could be considered to cover larger cognitive extents.…”
Section: Cognitive Extentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D is a measure of type-token ratios based on a random sampling of stretches of 50 words; i.e., it is not sensitive to variation in text length (see McKee et al 2000). A high score reflects low type-token ratios; i.e., greater lexical diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%