Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-Pecuniary Damage Under the European Convention on Human Rights

Abstract

This is the first study to examine the awards made by the European Court of Human Rights in respect of non-pecuniary damage from an empirical perspective. It uses a multiple regression analysis based on data (929 observations) drawn from the Council of Europe's Human Rights Documentation database. We identified three elements of the "equity principle" used by the Court for the calculation of awards made in respect of nonpecuniary damage (seriousness of the violation, applicant-and overall context-related factors). Our empirical results show that there is a statistically significant association between the amount awarded in respect of nonpecuniary damage and the intensity of the violation, the existence of a separate opinion, the respondent state, and the fact whether the applicant is a legal or a natural person. Our study therefore contradicts the view voiced in the literature that awards made in respect of non-pecuniary damage under the ECHR are "unpredictable" and "inconsistent".

The UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and the Greening of Human Rights Litigation: Fishing in Fragmented Waters?

“…The difficulties start with the data collection and with the definition of the types of remedy and its scope, as each remedy can redress or compensate several types of violation of several types of rights. Therefore, the effectiveness of the remedy depends on multiple variables, such as the concrete circumstances, the type of abuse, and the type of right violated that go beyond a legal positivist analysis [122,221].…”

Immaterieller Schadensersatz und der Wandel völkerrechtlicher Privatrechtsanalogien

“…764 Die Höhe des immateriellen Schadensersatzes bestimmt sich daher alleine nach sozialen Konventionen. 765 Dementsprechend bemisst der IGH den immateriellen Schadensersatz nach Billigkeits-gesichtspunkten. 766 An dieser Stelle gehen immaterieller Schadensersatz und Strafschadensersatz aus der Sicht mancher ineinander über: Wenn die Begründung für die konkrete Schadenssumme dürftig ist und die Summe in keinem Verhältnis zum erlittenen immateriellen Schaden zu stehen scheint, liegt die Vermutung eines versteckten Strafschadensersatzes nahe.…”

Economic and Social Rights, Reparations and the Aftermath of Widespread Violence: The African Human Rights System and Beyond

“…They are not intended to serve collective interest[s]' . 115 Likewise, since its first judgment, the IACtHR has construed the American Convention's provision on reparation (Art. 63 (1)) in terms of ensuring restitutio in integrum, 116 clarifying in future judgments that reparations seek 'to make disappear the effects of the violations committed ( .…”