The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MLSs are considered efficient alternatives to TLSs to mitigate occlusion problems [40,41]. They can be mounted on different platforms, such as smartphones [42], backpacks [43], cars [44], or handheld devices. Handheld mobile laser scanners (HMLSs), in particular, are among the most widely used MLSs in forestry [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLSs are considered efficient alternatives to TLSs to mitigate occlusion problems [40,41]. They can be mounted on different platforms, such as smartphones [42], backpacks [43], cars [44], or handheld devices. Handheld mobile laser scanners (HMLSs), in particular, are among the most widely used MLSs in forestry [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMU errors contribute to scanned features with low surface fidelities, especially when significant movement occurs during the acquisition of a given point cloud [25,26]. Other factors contributing to IMU errors include changes in walking speed, rapid movements, or turning the iPad during the course of a scan [5,11,22,24]. IMU errors were present in this study as well, with misaligned tree cross-sections encountered several times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This study achieved an overall RMSE of 1.5 cm (8.6%) for DBH values estimated from iPad Pro LiDAR data for 15 sites in the boreal forest. This is a lower RMSE than those reported in several previous studies using the iPad Pro to estimate DBH, such as: an urban park (Slovakia), 2.8 cm (7.0%) and 5.2 cm (13.0%); a research forest (Austria), 3.1 cm (10.5%) and 6.3 cm (21.2%); natural and plantation forests (Japan), 2.3 cm (10.5%); and, a university campus (Turkey), 2.3 cm (11.7%) [5,[22][23][24]. A previous study using the same methodology as used in this study reported an RMSE of 1.1 cm (6.2%) for a plantation forest in Canada [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%