Measuring the value of groundwater and other forms of natural capital

Abstract

Valuing natural capital is fundamental to measuring sustainability. The United Nations Environment Programme, World Bank, and other agencies have called for inclusion of the value of natural capital in sustainability metrics, such as inclusive wealth. Much has been written about the importance of natural capital, but consistent, rigorous valuation approaches compatible with the pricing of traditional forms of capital have remained elusive. We present a guiding quantitative framework enabling natural capital valuation that is fully consistent with capital theory, accounts for biophysical and economic feedbacks, and can guide interdisciplinary efforts to measure sustainability. We illustrate this framework with an application to groundwater in the Kansas High Plains Aquifer, a rapidly depleting asset supporting significant food production. We develop a 10-y time series (1996−2005) of natural capital asset prices that accounts for technological, institutional, and physical changes. Kansas lost approximately $110 million per year (2005 US dollars) of capital value through groundwater withdrawal and changes in aquifer management during the decade spanning 1996–2005. This annual loss in wealth is approximately equal to the state’s 2005 budget surplus, and is substantially more than investments in schools over this period. Furthermore, real investment in agricultural capital also declined over this period. Although Kansas’ depletion of water wealth is substantial, it may be tractably managed through careful groundwater management and compensating investments in other natural and traditional assets. Measurement of natural capital value is required to inform management and ongoing investments in natural assets.

Economic Value of Parks via Human Mental Health: An Analytical Framework

“…Economic values of conservation include: those which accrue to individuals whether or not they visit protected areas; and those which accrue only to individuals who use protected areas directly. The former have been analyzed largely as ecosystem services (Costanza et al, 1997;Balmford et al, 2002;De Groot et al, 2012;Fenichel et al, 2016), estimated at US$145 trillion worldwide in 2011 (Costanza et al, 2014). The latter include tourism and recreation (Balmford et al, 2009), estimated at US$600 billion globally (Balmford et al, 2015).…”

Transition Pathways to Sustainable Agricultural Water Management: A Review of Integrated Modeling Approaches

“…Concerns with declining water tables in Texas in the 1930s eventually led to the call for efficient agricultural water use throughout the High Plains region (White et al 1946;Green 1981). Despite widespread declines, particularly in the Southern and Central High Plains, the aquifer remains an important source of groundwater: Fenichel et al (2016) estimated that from 1996 to 2005, irrigators in Kansas withdrew groundwater valued at about $110 million/yr in natural capital. Research from the HPA may be applicable to other large aquifers such as the Loess Plateau of China (Gates et al 2011) and the Murray-Darling Basin of Australia (Quiggin et al 2010).…”

Modeling the Economic Value of Blue Carbon in Delaware Estuary Wetlands: Historic Estimates and Future Projections

“…Refuge and nursery habitat are just two of the ecosystem services provided by coastal wetlands. Ecosystem services are defined as the natural processes and components of ecosystems that provide goods and services that satisfy human needs, either directly or indirectly (De Groot, 1992;Fenichel et al, 2016;Guerry et al, 2015;Tiner, 2003). Other ecosystem services provided by wetlands include water filtration, sediment retention, storm surge buffering, and carbon sequestration (Barbier et al, 2011;Morgan et al, 2009;Pinsky et al, 2013).…”